John Kasich and Lehman, Cont.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


John Kasich, a former GOP congressman and onetime Lehman Brothers managing director, is running for governor of Ohio against incumbent Democrat Ted Strickland. He wants you to know he was just “one of 700” managing directors at the failed investment bank:

The fact that Kasich feels obligated to address his work at Lehman means that Strickland’s “He’s an outsider” attacks must be working. Eric Kleefeld says Kasich “clearly…wants to change the subject back to the bad economy.” The problem, of course, is that Lehman Brothers and the bad economy are inextricably linked in most people’s minds. So it’s going to be hard for Kasich to talk jobs without talking about his old one. 

Clearly there’s plenty of blame to go around for the financial crisis. But the idea (promoted by Kasich here) that you had to actually be running Lehman to bear some responsibility for its behavior is madness. I know it really hurts bankers‘ feelings when people suggest that Wall Street might have, you know, played a role in its own near-collapse. But it’s true! And let’s be honest about what Kasich was doing when he was working for Lehman in Columbus, Ohio. While he spent most of his time working with the private sector, he clearly did some work trying to convince state pension funds to trust Lehman with their money. 

It’s not even clear to me why state pension funds should be playing the stock market in the first place. Stocks clearly aren’t a safe bet (Ohio funds later invested at least $100 million with Lehman in unrelated deals), and people’s retirements are at stake. But state pension funds have a ton of money, and Wall Street banks like Lehman have a huge incentive to try to get the fees that come from investing that kind of money.

So a lot of the interactions between pension funds and Wall Street (or Wall Street’s middlemen) look kind of sleazy. The Wall Street firms (or their middlemen) hire former politicians or officials to talk up their old buddies (like they did with Kasich). Alternatively, they just go ahead and give big campaign donations to the politicians who oversee the funds—a move that even the SEC thinks looks a lot like pay-to-play

Meanwhile, it’s abundantly clear that Kasich worries about Ohio voters knowing the full extent of the state’s Lehman losses. In June, the Associated Press obtained an email sent by a Kasich campaign employee in which the employee asked an Ohio pension fund executive to be sure to explain that “not all the money it lost was a result of the Lehman bankruptcy.” Lehman is Kasich’s albatross, and it’s not going away with one ad.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate