Woe Christmas Tree: Wal-Mart Buys Ornaments From a Chinese Sweatshop

Just in time for the holidays, teenage whistleblowers expose the factory where kids make tree-trimmings on the cheap.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Six months ago, they were just kids hoping to make some extra dough at a summer job. Now this group of fearless Chinese high school students finds itself up against the largest retailer in the world—Wal-Mart. With the help of the National Labor Committee—the American outfit famed for shaming Kathy Lee Gifford for her line’s exploitative labor practices—the teenagers have brought to light yet another scandal with big implications. Turns out the Guangzhou Huanya ornaments factory in Guangdong, where the high school students worked, employs children as young as 12, who are forced to work 15 hour days, 7 days a week to make Wal-Mart’s Christmas ornaments in time for the holiday season. It might come as no surprise that the wages paid by the big box behemoth’s manufacturers are paltry, but these kids earn only half of China’s minimum wage—just 26 cents an hour.

Last July, the high school students decided to take matters into their own hands: They documented the conditions by smuggling cell phones into the factory, went on strike, and filed a complaint with the local labor bureau—and the NLC—regarding the working conditions. As if the long hours and pitiful paychecks weren’t bad enough, workers at the factory have been exposed to dangerous chemicals that cause skin rashes and sores. But the management of the factory doesn’t pay for medical bills or allow sick days and docks workers who quit unexpectedly an entire month’s pay.

“These kids are the protagonists in this story,” said Barbara Briggs of the NLC. “They had the nerve and guts to bring cell phones in to take pictures. They went to bat for the 12 year olds.” Briggs emphasizes the fact that when it comes to Wal-Mart’s labor policies, Guangzhou Huanya factory is not the exception. “This case makes it clear that hiring young workers is an institutionalized practice,” she said when we spoke today after the release of the group’s investigative report. “This is the way Wal-Mart is doing business. It’s not an anomaly, and this factory isn’t just a hole in the wall.”

Indeed, the Guangzhou Huanya factory in Guangdong employs 8,000 workers and is among the top three Christmas ornament makers in mainland China, supplying Target and other retailers as well. The new NLC report finds that each worker at the factory is expected to pump out tens of thousands of ornaments a day, hand painting one every 39 seconds, or spray painting, without gloves or masks, between 64,000 and 76,800 hanging decorations each shift.

Wal-Mart says it’s investigating the situation, but has given no indication of a timeframe for action. The retail giant didn’t bother to comment on its website about the young workers’ plight. Instead, the site boasts a story casting the store in a more favorable light: “Local Kids Get a Wal-Mart Shopping Spree.”

Reports of dangerous working conditions and labor abuses in China are not new. The country, long condemned for its human rights abuses, has become the world’s most prolific manufacturer in the last quarter century. And with all the news about hazardous toys made in China, it’s not surprising that some Washington ears perk up when issues concerning Chinese-made goods are at hand. Yesterday Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND) issued a statement condemning Wal-Mart’s practices. “Chinese sweatshops now produce not only the toys under our Christmas trees, but even the ornaments that hang on those trees,” the statement reads. “It is completely against the spirit of Christmas to produce ornaments in sweatshop factories where the workers are physically abused and financially cheated. We need to get serious about keeping the products of foreign sweatshops off American shelves. And we shouldn’t wait until next year’s holiday season rolls around before we take action.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate