Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Ask most people what they think President Clinton ought to do in his last two years and they provide you with an instant assessment of the man and how he has either failed their hopes and expectations or fulfilled them. I spoke with 20 luminaries from a variety of fields in order to hear their answers to these questions. I went to conservatives as well as progressives, as I wanted differing points of view and not just those from the choir. Although I probed for specific suggestions as to how Clinton might help either the republic or himself, most of those I spoke with wanted to take his current measure and talk about how he has performed to date.

Back to Eric Alterman’s commentary . . .

Click on the faces for further commentary . . .

[Image]Eugene McCarthy

Former U.S. Senator and Democratic presidential candidate

“Fire all the Rhodes and Oxford scholars and everyone from Arkansas.”

[Image]Jessica Mitford

Author and journalist

“‘No more guts than a pissant.’ It’s too late for him to reverse.”

[Image]David Halberstam

Author and journalist

“All the report cards aren’t as bad as they seem.”

[Image]Robert Jay Lifton

Psychiatrist

“Clinton’s backing down encourages his enemies to stop anything he initiates.”

[Image]Henry Louis Gates Jr.

Professor of Humanities

“I suspect that his Haiti policy augurs a new day [in foreign policy].”

[Image]Isabel Allende

Novelist

“He should use his charisma more. Perhaps on a weekly, live program.”

[Image]Ralph Nader

Consumer activist

“Encourage more access to telecommunication systems. Citizen-action channels.”

[Image]John Leo

Neoconservative columnist for U.S. News & World Report

“He has to stop jogging in those stupid shorts and playing instruments.”

[Image]Christina Hoff Sommers

Professor of Philosophy and author of “Who Stole Feminism?”

“Get [Surgeon General] Elders to work on teen promiscuity.”

[Image]Nancy J. Chodorow

Psychoanalyst, sociologist, and author

“Foster real family connections instead of child case-workers.”

[Image]Jerry Brown

Former Governor of California, national radio talk-show host

“It’s not easy to take a populist position, but if you don’t, you might as well be a Republican.”

[Image]Kevin Phillips

Conservative theorist

“He may have to be the president who proves the system doesn’t work very well.”

[Image]Naomi Wolf

Feminist author

“Require employers to include reproductive health care.”

[Image]Ronald Takaki

Professor of Ethnic Studies

“He has to address the R word–race. He should read Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address.”

[Image]Ramsey Clark

Former U.S. Attorney General

“If he does [fail], the cost to the country and its people will be absolutely enormous.”

[Image]Tony Kushner

Playwright

“The nation’s disenfranchised can be galvanized with a reasonable agenda.”

[Image]Michael Parenti

Author, political analyst, and lecturer

“Create jobs in mass transit, conservation, alternative energy, and environmental preservation.”

[Image]Michael Dorris

Author and journalist

“Act like a second-term president. Trust his humane instincts and ’60s idealism.”

[Image]Juan Williams

Author and journalist

“How can we get that kind of idealism back into the American mind?”

[Image]Anne Taylor Fleming

Writer and commentator

“It’s almost as if he doesn’t know he’s a leader.”

Michael Krasny hosts “Forum,” a West Coast public affairs radio show recognized for its discussion of serious issues. He is a regular contributor to Mother Jones. Research assistance by Holly Kernan.

Photo-Illustrations by Peter Nies, based on images by Bret Littlehales (McCarthy), Novelle Saarinen (Mitford), Bruce Plotkin (Halberstam), Thomas Victor (Lifton), Sarah Putnam (Gates), Marcia Lieberman (Allende), Chick Harrity (Leo), Joyce Ravid (Sommers), Akiko Nishimura (Chodorow), Julie Brown (Brown), Katherine Lambert (Phillips), Kate Connell (Wolf), Carol Takaki (Takaki), Jay Thompson (Kushner), Anita Newby (Parenti), Louise Erdrich (Dorris), Louis Myrie (Williams), David Strick (Fleming).

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate