A Land Ruled by Rain

Drought has sped up changes to Mali’s traditional life

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The government discourages female genital excisions, but they remain, together with polygamy and arranged marriages, a stubborn, controversial feature of Mali’s patrilineal and largely Muslim culture. Severe droughts have strained Mali’s already weak economy–which is based primarily on farming and animal husbandry–and forced more rural women into the cities. There, small improvements in women’s education and more women-owned businesses–as well as increases in prostitution–are all signs that some traditional rules for women may be eroding.

Following those traditions, Pama Kondo, 34, spent much of her childhood caring for her grandmother. At 18, she married Natomo, with whom she has five children. Natomo’s second wife, Fatouma, has three. The women live separately, but share meals and responsibilities. Kondo also handles the sale of rice and millet in Mopti, an overnight boat ride from their village. She feels her life is no different from her mother’s, and that her daughter’s will also be the same.

PAMA KONDO: My husband and I work together and are faithful to each other. It was his decision to marry a second wife. Some wives do not get along, but we have no misunderstandings, we are equal. If I go to sell in Mopti, Fatouma stays home.

I think my husband will take another wife soon, to help me. Even if Natomo married four women, I would be lucky because I am the first, and I will decide the roles. Natomo will tell me if he’s going to take another wife, but it is not my problem to decide if I love her or not; everything depends on Natomo.

I would like to have more children, even five more. They could help me work–some could become fishers, some farmers, some civil servants–and if I get hurt, they would care for me.

In my mother’s time, you could find many fish in the river, but now fish are scarce and women have to work hard to sell things to feed the family. Women, most of the time, are the harder workers. Besides fishing, men cannot do much; besides fishing, men just talk and wait for money from the women. I would like it if women in my country had less work to do.

Go to Brazil . . .

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate