Loud Mouths in Quiet Times

Protest in the age of contentment

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In December, just as we were beginning this issue, the U.S. began bombing Iraq. Nationwide, the bombing of a country we thought we had already defeated — for reasons that turn out to be ever more murky — led to little visible outrage. Perhaps it didn’t help that, before many of us even became used to the idea, the networks told us 75 percent of Americans believed the attacks were warranted. Like so much else in modern life, the bombings seemed to have been focus-group tested and preapproved for public consumption.

What had promised to be the most celebrated protest of the year — before it was pre-empted by the Iraq bombings — was the Rev. Jesse Jackson’s vigil in Washington, D.C., meant to remind members of the House of Representatives who were on the verge of impeaching Clinton that they were acting against the will of the people. Then again, Jackson also had the polls behind him.

It’s a message echoed in much of society, from the zealous celebration of the stock market’s rise (which benefits only the country’s richest 10 percent) to what President Clinton brags is “the longest peacetime economic expansion in our history…and the lowest peacetime unemployment since 1957.” Never mind the slowly but steadily growing gap between rich and poor and a minimum wage that, to have its 1968 purchasing power, would need to be at least $7.45 per hour, instead of the current $5.15. A Gallup Poll reports that 78 percent of us are satisfied with our standard of living; 84 percent with the opportunities we have had to succeed. The message to any dissenter seems pretty clear: Times are good — what are you complaining about?

Fundamental to the American identity, however, is the right to speak out, to dissent, and in the past year there were protests that both captured public attention and challenged public opinion. We’ve given a few of them a close look, asking what made them stand out and what that says about the protesters and about us (and the media).

We look at whether throwing pies will set us free; decipher the complex factors that transformed death row inmate Mumia Abu-Jamal into a cultural icon; consider the Rev. Fred Phelps’ crusade against gays; and try to figure out what turned “bunny huggers” into arsonists. We also analyze how the Internet has (and has not) proved useful for the disenfranchised. And if you feel inspired to start your own protest, we offer budding rabble-rousers a few pointers.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate