Communism for Profiteers

Several hundred titans of American business are off to China to ponder that country’s massive market potential, and to celebrate 50 years of communism.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As Congress argues about alleged tranfer of sensitive military secrets and technology to China, and while officials in Beijing step up their campaign against dissidents, Fortune magazine is arranging for several hundred corporate executives to travel to Shanghai this fall, just in time to celebrate half a century of Chinese communism. The execs will be attending the invitation-only 1999 Fortune Global Forum — participation is limited to “chairmen, presidents, and CEOs of major multinational companies” — which will focus on “the practical realities of doing business in China today and into the next century.”

Entitled “China: The Next Fifty Years,” three-day event will open on Sept. 27 and conclude just prior to the official celebration on Oct. 1 marking the 50th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic. Along with corporate honchos from Sweden, Germany, Finland, Brazil, Japan, India, and England, there will be American execs from companies such as Dell Computer Corp., Ford Motor Co., General Electric Co., and Honeywell Inc. Chinese business and government leaders will be on hand as well, thereby giving Global Forum participants the opportunity to, as the event’s promotional materials put it “network with good people.”

According to Fortune, some of the corporate chieftains will travel on to Beijing “for anniversary commemorations” of 50 years of communism and watch the Chinese military parade at Tiananmen Square as part of the festivities. Fortune is careful to point out, however, that the executives who do choose to go on to Beijing will be attending the fête on their own, and not as part of the conference.

One astonished China watcher on Capitol Hill, who asked not to be named, thought it more than ironic that the titans of capitalism are traveling to China to celebrate the achievements of communism. “What does it imply for the future of democracy in China? If you are struggling to bring democracy to China, you have to fight not only the secret police, but now Western business interests and the Western media as well.”

The Chinese government is rolling out the red carpet for the CEOs. They’ll be officially welcomed by President Jiang Zemin, who is scheduled to travel to Shanghai to deliver the keynote address at the opening night dinner. Jiang has also “inscribed a greeting in calligraphy, sending his personal best wishes for the Forum’s success,” according to the conference’s Web site.

Of course, no China affair would be complete without former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, the man who downplayed the massacre at Tiananmen Square and who now consults for companies doing business in China. He’s slated to be the main attraction at the luncheon on the Global Forum’s second day.

Other retired government officials set to journey to Shanghai include former United States Trade Representative Carla Hills and former Commerce Secretary Mickey Kantor, who is scheduled to deliver a speech entitled “What Now for China?” Fortune has also lined up a lecture by Lee Kuan Yew, who was the notoriously law-and-order-obsessed prime minister of Singapore for 37 years and who now serves as a senior minister in that country.

The conference is being organized by Fortune’s business side — the head of the magazine’s conference division, John Needham, has temporarily moved to Shanghai to oversee planning for the gala affair — but a number of editors and journalists are attending, including some senior Fortune editors who will be moderating panel discussions. These include Norman Pearlstine, editor-in-chief of Fortune and Time magazines as well as other Time Inc. publications, and John Huey, Fortune managing editor. In a Global Forum brochure, Huey describes the affair as “the most important international event in our magazine’s 69-year history.”

next

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate