More Money for Colombian Thugs

Colombia may be about to become one of the US’ top aid recipients — but it’s also one of the world’s worst human-rights abusers.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


President Clinton announced last week that he will be asking Congress to boost US aid to Colombia by $1.3 billion dollars over the next two years, which would make the war-ravaged country the third-largest recipient of US handouts. But aid is not the only list Colombia tops: It also ranks among the world’s leaders in human-rights violations.

According to the US State Department’s own latest human-rights report, Colombian “government forces continued to commit numerous, serious abuses, including extrajudicial killings.” According to the report, government forces were responsible for at least 21 extrajudicial killings; government forces also collaborated with right-wing paramilitary groups responsible for killing at least another 573 civilians. Human Rights Watch reports that the paramilitaries committed 78 per cent of all human rights violations in Colombia last year.

Despite its miserable record, the Colombian military may soon have a lot more firepower, compliments of US taxpayers. The lion’s share of the proposed aid would be spent on 63 combat helicopters designated for use in “counter-narcotics” operations. The US will also help upgrade some of Colombia’s existing air force equipment.

President Clinton said the massive aid package is necessary to keep illegal drugs from entering the US, and “to help Colombia promote peace and prosperity and deepen its democracy.” When pressed on the propriety of giving more than one and a half billion dollars in primarily military aid to a regime with such a deplorable human-rights record, State Department officials point to a law known as the Leahy amendment, named after Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont.

The Leahy amendment requires the US embassy in any country receiving military aid to insure that any military unit receiving US support has a clean human-rights record. State Department officials point out that the vast majority of the proposed Colombia package will be used by three new, US trained counternarcotics battalions.

But Leahy himself opposes the aid package. Following Clinton’s announcement, Leahy denounced the US aid boost to Colombia, calling the package a “dramatic ratcheting up of a counter-insurgency policy in the name of a counter-drug policy.” He called for the Colombian army to “thwart the paramilitary groups, who are responsible for most of the atrocities against civilians, and…to turn over to the civilian courts their own members who violate human rights.”

Leahy is not alone in opposing the aid package. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and several other human rights groups have all issued statements condemning the aid increase. Human Rights Watch Executive Director Kenneth Roth recently slammed the administration for essentially circumventing the Leahy law. “The US has been willing to settle for the mere transfer of abusive members of (a) unit rather than their prosecution, which sends the signal that you can just… engage in a shell game and move people around.”

The administration is touting the package as desperately needed aid to an ally in dire straits. But more weapons are hardly the kind of help a country devastated by violence needs.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate