New Storm Over Pacifica

A call for peace between warring sides at the progressive radio network may only make matters worse.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


(This is a corrected version of this article.)

In an unprecedented twist in the bitter struggle at the Pacifica radio network, a group of 42 prominent progressives signed a letter this week calling for a truce between management at the alternative broadcast network and workers at its flagship station in Berkeley — but in doing so, they may have only escalated the conflict.

“I’m looking for peace,” says filmmaker Saul Landau, the letter’s author and a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, a progressive think tank. While the letter calls for reconciliation, it also castigates the network’s critics for “Pacifica bashing” and calls a recent strike by free-lance contributors to the Pacifica News Network “unconscionable.” Other prominent signers include Oakland mayor Jerry Brown, actors Ed Asner and Mike Farrell, and David Corn, Washington editor of The Nation.

“I keep asking (Pacifica critics), what is the strategy?” says Landau. “How are we going to get past this? And I hear accusations: They did this, and they did that. I say that may be so, but what’s the strategy to move on?”

Many KPFA supporters, though, see the letter more as a call to arms than a call for peace. “It’s not conciliatory,” said Andrea Buffa, executive director of Media Alliance and a vocal KPFA supporter. “It’s a veiled attack on Pacifica critics.”

The dispute has proven deeply divisive within the progressive community. The conflict began with the abrupt dismissal in March 1999 of Nicole Sawaya, the popular general manager at KPFA, which shocked long-standing employees and listeners. When Larry Bensky, a KPFA talk show host sometimes called the station’s “signature voice,” criticized the dismissal on the air, he was fired. KPFA staff cried censorship.

Listeners and supporters picketed the station, drawing national media attention. The level of vitriol escalated in July when “Flashpoints” host Dennis Bernstein was pulled off the air and forcibly removed from the premises for airing a news item that Pacifica management deemed critical of itself on his show. The following month saw a lockout of station staff by Pacifica management, live programming replaced by taped shows and music, and nonstop demonstrations. Names like Joan Baez, Noam Chomsky and others chimed in to support the protest.

Landau says he was impelled to write the letter after the conflict’s latest flare-up: In early February Dan Coughlin, news director for Pacifica National News, was removed from his duties after running a piece that addressed a conflict between Pacifica management and 16 Pacifica affiliates. A group of news free-lancers for PNN called for a work stoppage in protest. Pacifica said Coughlin was moved for other reasons.

While affirming the free-lancers’ right to disagree with Pacifica management, Landau charges that, “They do not have a right to cloak their grievances in the language of a bona fide labor dispute,” traditionally a powerful symbol among those on the left.

Striking Pacifica free-lancer Robin Urevich disagrees. “Many strikes don’t have to do with working conditions and wages, but have to do with workers’ ability to have some control over their work,” she says. She compares the striking free-lancers to nurses who strike out of concern that patients get good care.

Landau says he’s simply out to calm the debate. “This is an act of faith — faith in the reasonableness of people on both sides,” he says.

That’s not how it sounds to Nicole Sawaya, the former KPFA general manager whose dismissal started it all. She credits Landau with good intentions, but says, “Now is not the time to join hands and sing ‘Kumbaya.'” She puts the blame on Pacifica management, saying KPFA’s efforts to negotiate “have been rebuffed every step of the way.”

Though the letter decries the “veritable war on Pacifica” which “could lead to the death of the only alternative radio network progressives possess,” Landau insists that the letter does not support management. “Pacifica made terrible mistakes. I don’t think (in the letter) I’ve said anything good about how the board has handled things,” he says.

As the free-lancer strike continues, the February 27 meeting of Pacifica’s board in Washington promises to be acrimonious, amid charges that new nominees for the board are continuing what Pacifica critics say is a trend toward stacking Pacifica’s board with non-progressive, corporate-friendly members.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate