Abortion at Sea

A Dutch doctor aims to launch a floating clinic to help women end unwanted pregnancies offshore, out of reach of their countries’ laws.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Women around the world who can’t get abortions in their native lands may soon have a chance to get them at sea.

Dr. Rebecca Gomperts, a physician in the Netherlands, is currently working to raise a million dollars to equip a ship, to be dubbed Sea Change, as an ocean-borne abortion clinic. Gomperts aims to sail around the world, picking up women with unwanted pregnancies in countries that ban abortions and taking them 12 miles offshore into international waters to perform the procedure. On shore, she and her half-dozen crew members will also train local abortion providers, give out contraceptives, and hold workshops on reproductive health issues.

The World Health Organization estimates that 20 million of 53 million abortions each year are performed under unsafe and illegal conditions and result in the deaths of some 70,000 women. By offering safe, legal abortion services, Gomperts aims to help offset those numbers to some small degree — and to help inspire women’s groups, legislators, and public health workers to agitate for easier access to abortion.

“The main idea is to reduce mortalities caused by unsafe abortions,” says Gomperts.

The idea for Sea Change was born while Gomperts served as a physician on Greenpeace’s ship, the Rainbow Warrior. Greenpeace’s ability to change public policy through direct actions convinced her that similar strategies could be used to improve reproductive rights on a country-by-country basis.

But will her floating clinic plan hold water? Predictably, the ship has triggered a flood of controversy before it has even launched. When word recently leaked out that Sea Change will make the heavily-Catholic island state of Malta one of its stops, local officials were outraged. Leading bishops called the plan a “monstrosity”; deputy prime minister Lawrence Gonzi called it “horrendous” and has threatened to prosecute anyone cooperating with Gomperts.

In Europe, Ireland and Poland also ban abortions. But Gomperts says the need for her services is most acute in South America, Africa, and Southeast Asia. No matter where she plans to go, however, pro-life activists hope Gomperts’ plan dies in the water.

The idea “isn’t just wrong; it’s stupid,” says Father Richard Welch, president of US-based Human Life International. “To perform this procedure on a ship, with the difficulties in maintaining a proper surgical environment, without proper follow-up care, while making these women endure a 25-mile ferry ride on the open ocean, is unconscionably bad treatment of women.”

Gomperts insists the women will not be in any danger. She will only perform first-trimester abortions, she says, which she calls “very simple” procedures. “Under local anesthesia, it won’t take more than five to 10 minutes,” says Gomperts. “It will be very safe, and if there are any complications, I’m sure we can treat them on board.”

Anika Rahman, director of international programs at the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, is concerned about how local women’s groups will respond to a foreign entity providing abortion services.

“The local groups may feel like somebody is stepping on their toes,” she says.

There’s also concern that women who receive abortions on board Sea Change may be prosecuted upon returning to their home country — as the Maltese deputy prime minister has threatened.

Whether international waters are considered outside domestic abortion laws varies from country to country, says University of Richmond law professor John Paul Jones, an expert in comparative constitutional law.

Gomperts says that she’ll only go where she’s invited. “We’ve had a lot of positive responses — otherwise, we wouldn’t be doing this,” she says. “We have already identified some countries where the groups are really, really interested in working with us. And those are the countries we go to, not anywhere else.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate