updates

The latest developments on issues covered by Mother Jones, and brief coverage of underreported news.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Seeking Data on the Drug War’s Child Casualties#
July 24, 2002

With an estimated half-million American adults currently behind bars on drug charges, child welfare and prison reform activists have long warned that the War on Drugs is inflicting enormous collateral damage on tens of thousands of innocent bystanders: the children of prisoners. Now, for the first time, a new study attempts to determine just how many such children there are in at least one state.

#

See the MotherJones.com article Left Behind, part of our special report, Debt to Society: The Real Price of Prisons.

#

Still, the statistics included in the study, compiled by New York-based Human Rights Watch, remain only estimates — and the report underscores just how little data exists concerning the deeper economic, social and psychological cost of parental incarceration.

“This is a very low priority group inside of a larger low priority group on a national agenda,” says Denise Johnson of the Center for Children of Incarcerated Parents. “These kids have not ever really counted for much.”

The Human Rights Watch study estimates that 23,537 children in New York alone have at least one parent serving a prison sentence for a drug conviction. Using data from a 2000 Bureau of Justice Statistics report, the study also estimates that nearly 125,000 children in the state have had at least one parent sent to prison for drug charges since 1980.

The data reinforce what child welfare and prison rights activists have long assumed, and while the report addresses New York alone, advocates argue the situation is likely to be similar in most other major states. Indeed, a 2000 study in California, commissioned by the state assembly, estimated that 856,000 minors — nine percent of the state’s children — had at least one parent “currently involved in California’s adult criminal justice system.”

While the New York and California reports provide some evidence to better frame the debate, they are both hampered by the fact that no agency actually tracks precisely how many children nationwide lose a parent to prison. The federal Department of Justice, for instance, has been collecting a broad spectrum of data on state inmates since the 1970s. It was not until the late 1990s, however, that it began looking into the numbers of prisoners with children — and the best data it has remain estimates.

The Human Rights Watch report acknowledges that much remains unclear about how the incarcerations of a parent changes a child’s life. For instance, there are no good statistics about how many children face a changed living arrangement as a result of the jailing of a parent. Moreover, while stating that child experts “agree that loss of parents to prison can be a continuing emotional trauma for children,” the report also acknowledges that the evidence for such psychological strain remains anecdotal.

In most states, the question of what happens to the children of prisoners is often an afterthought at best. In California, for instance, Mike Van Winkel, a spokesperson for the state Department of Justice, says there is no established policy on collecting data on dependents at the time of arrest. While police officers have been instructed to call child welfare officials when processing prisoners, doing so is usually left to the discretion of the officer involved, Van Winkel says.

“For the most part, this population is a silent voice in the political world,” says Gwynnae Byrd, a consultant on prisons hired by the California legislature. “We only think about the punishment side of things. We don’t think about the domino, the ripple effect that it has on all other people who are affected when somebody gets arrested and incarcerated.”
— George Sanchez

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate