How the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Became Law

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


 

july 12, 2001: President Bush lays out plans for Medicare prescription drug benefit.

june 20, 2003: Medicare actuary Richard Foster is warned not to disclose to Congress his estimate of the proposal’s true cost. “The consequences for insubordination are extremely severe,” Foster is told.

june 27, 2003: Senate and House approve different versions of the drug bill. Rep. Billy Tauzin, R-La., one of the legislation’s principal authors, describes it as “a shot of legislative botox [that] will rejuvenate an antiquated program by eliminating the age-old lines of a different era.”

july 15, 2003: Conference committee of 5 Democrats and 12 Republicans begins work to reconcile the two versions of the bill.

nov 13, 2003: President Bush calls on Congress to “finish the job.”

nov 17, 2003: aarp endorses bill, launches $7 million ad campaign.

nov 21, 2003: Bush calls wavering Republicans from Air Force One.

nov 22, 2003:
3:01am3:01 a.m. House begins voting on unified bill; roll call to last 15 minutes.
3:30am3:30 a.m. With bill losing 212-to-214, Speaker Dennis Hastert keeps voting open.
4:15am4:15 a.m. Bush calls several lawmakers, pleading for votes.
4:20am4:20 a.m. Hastert and hhs Secretary Tommy Thompson, who have been scurrying around House floor rounding up votes, corral Rep. Nick Smith, R-Mich.; he’ll later say (and then recant claim) that they offered donations and endorsements for his son’s congressional campaign in return for a vote.
5:53am5:53 a.m. After longest roll call in House history, bill is approved 220-to-215.

dec 16, 2003: Thomas Scully resigns as administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, joins Alston & Bird, where he will lobby for drug companies.

march 5, 2004: Patrick Morrisey, who as chief health counsel of the House energy and commerce committee was a principal staff author of the bill, takes job as lobbyist for drugmakers. In all, 15 members of Congress, staffers, and officials who worked on the drug bill will go to work for industry.

sept 30, 2004: Following an investigation of Rep. Smith’s bribery allegations, House ethics committee admonishes three representatives, including Majority Leader Tom DeLay and Rep. Smith himself, for “making public statements that risked impugning the reputation of the House.”

dec 15, 2004: Rep. Tauzin named president of drug lobby group PhRMA; annual pay reported at $2 million.

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate