MoJo’s December HELLRAISER!

Outfront presents a “Hellraiser”–a unique or surprising activist in the tradition of Mary Harris “Mother” Jones–in every issue. Send your nominations to hellraiser@motherjones.com. (If your Hellraiser is selected, you’ll get a free T-shirt.)

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


NAME:
Brian Hockett
OCCUPATION:
Range conservationist with the Bureau of Land Management, enforcing grazing regulations and fees on public lands
TAKES FLAK FROM:
Ranchers, BLM managers
CLAIM TO SHAME:
Reprimanded by the BLM for 19 allegations of misconduct, including “driving in an unsafe manner when angry” and “refer[ring] to himself as amanagement’s worst nightmare'”
CLAIM TO FAME:
“Brian, keep up the good work” (note from Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt)

On the frontier battleground between free-range cowboys and federal-land managers, 38-year-old Brian Hockett, a wildlife conservationist with the BLM in Dillon, Mont., came to a simple decision: “You’ve gotta be a bad cop or be quiet. Most [government employees] are just quiet.”

Ever since Bruce Babbitt took office, Western ranchers, loggers, and miners have locked horns with federal-land managers bent on charging higher grazing fees, exacting mining royalties, and implementing stringent environmental reform on government-owned lands. Not surprisingly, at the BLM, which oversees 270 million acres of public land in the West, things have gotten ugly, especially for Hockett.

The Clinton administration’s first BLM director, Jim Baca, an outspoken reformer, was forced to resign. Now, without Baca’s support (and in the shadow of Western senators and governors who, environmentalists claim, kowtow to the cowboys), BLM’s reform-minded employees are being made to feel like outlaws–often by their own bosses.

Reducing livestock is key to saving other species in rangeland ecosystems, but when Hockett recommends cattle reductions on Montana’s public lands, ranchers complain long and loud. “Words like ariparian ecosystem management’ don’t mean a whole lot to ranchers,” he says. “They don’t understand the damage livestock can inflict on the environment.

“We try to educate them, show them the data, but that’s not my job,” Hockett continues. “My job is to make recommendations and enforce laws. And the laws aren’t a popular thing right now.” After one tense meeting with local ranchers late last summer–at the same time that Babbitt personally lauded Hockett for his research–BLM managers reassigned Hockett to nearby Butte to conduct weed surveys.

While the Labor Department considers his formal complaint against the BLM, Hockett considers the dimming prospect of true reform. “The sad thing is that [the BLM is] more likely to believe a wing-tipped rancher than one of their own,” he says. “It’s all politics, I guess, but I’m not giving up.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate