MotherJones JF93: There’s no there here, either.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It began as a dream to give Universal City – a corporate hodge-podge of office towers, theme-park attractions, studio, hotels, and restaurants overlooking L.A.’s teeming San Fernando Valley – a “heart,” says James A. Nelson, vice president of MCA Development Company.

It’s called CityWalk, a four-block-long mall that will connect Universal’s massive cinema complex to the front gates of the studio. Designed by architect Jon Jerde, L.A.’s leading postmodernist comic, CityWalk attempts to distill the essence of indigenous Los Angeles – the wild and wacky feel of Melrose Avenue, Venice Beach, and Sunset Boulevard. Ironically, these places are now considered by many to be too mean to meander.

MCA president Lawrence D. Spungin describes the $100 million project, scheduled to open in March, as an “idealized reality.” CityWalk’s twenty-seven building facades will feature a cacophony of architectural styles that shout L.A. – Art Deco, Streamline Moderns, and California Crazy among them. Jaunty angles, bright colors, and contrasting textures will be featured in the “urban scale” design (one and a half times normal size), to complete the dizzying effect.

King Kong will hang from a seventy-foot neon “totem” near a surfboard-shaped active-wear shop. A fish restaurant will lure customers with its faux beach and wave machine. UCLA Extension, in a clutch of fourteen classrooms sporting a “Royce Hall-like” facade, will serve enlightenment. And gum wrappers embedded in the terrazzo flooring will provide instant history, or a “patina of use,” as project designer Richard Orne calls it.

CityWalk was to have been part of a $3 billion MCA “urbanopolis” with housing for twenty thousand people, While MCA has shelved that plan, some see even the pedestrian promenade joining a disturbing trend toward privatization of public places.

Mike Davis, author of the scathing history City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles, sighs at the mention of CityWalk. “I consider it an ominous parallel universe,” he says, “the moral equivalent of the neutron bomb. MCA executives have always stressed the most popular parts of L.A. are now too dangerous; the city scene is a criminalized Third World. So now they go off the real world to simulators.”

Leon Whiteson, architectural writer for the Los Angeles Times, is less rattled by the concept. “Private spaces masquerading as public places are increasingly common. CityWalk is going to look hokey because it’s instantaneous. But it’s better than not having public spaces at all.”

“Everything is private in Los Angeles,” notes historian Kevin Starr about the city in which a scant 4 percent of the land is reserved for open, public use. “Sharing common space of any kind is not part of the Los Angeles experience.”

Still, when community development is given over to corporations, Davis fears, society risks losing its soul. “There’s a struggle going on in America today to save the democracy of public space. I think CityWalk ought to be burnt down.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate