MotherJones JA93: Bad cop, no donut

Rating America’s police departments

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Most everywhere, cops are getting into the customer service business. For years, police officers, hampered by an authoritarian, top-down management system, have been discouraged from trying anything remotely creative. No wonder they’ve devolved into an angry, alienated subculture, seemingly holding off the tide of anarchy but unable to do a thing about it. But recently, a new school of thought has swept The Blue: give cops the skills to analyze underlying causes and the autonomy to figure out the best solutions–in concert with citizens. There are still, however, departments that do little or nothing, or that tried but failed due to a lack of long-term commitment at the top. A roundup of the best and the worst in community-oriented policing:

St. Louis:
Probably the best, the Gateway City has introduced community-oriented policing on the broadest scale. By the end of 1994, every officer on the 1,500-member force will be trained in problem solving. * * * * *
Newport News, Va.:
Police and building managers set up a mini-station in a drug-infested housing complex. In just a few months, the dealers were out. Departmentwide innovations without additional funding. * * * * *
San Diego:
A “friendly vigilante” system combats gay-bashing in one neighborhood. Locals patrol with loaned cellular phones, calling in anti-gay activity and honking if they see an attack. Incidents declined 90 percent. * * * * *
Madison, Wis.:
Chief David Couper compares local beat cops to “family practitioners.” One learned the Asian Hmong dialect to address the problem of young men kidnapping adolescent girls as brides. Another spends days-off teaching word-processing to unemployed neighborhood women. * * * * 1/2
Miami:
Problem-solving Neighborhood Enhancement Teams, which include cops, staff eleven mini-city halls around town. Citizen concerns, from gang violence to senior services, get immediate attention, and residents can reach NET officers twenty-four hours a day via beeper. * * * * 1/2
Tucson:
When squad cars started heading into Native American neighborhoods just to talk, relations soared. Cooperation with the public led to a huge drop in the burglary rate, once the nation’s highest. * * * *
Portland, Ore.,
is known for its vision at the top, and in Austin, Texas, community policing is “routine”! * * * *
New York City:
Troubled neighborhoods got blue-and-white RVs, overseen by an officer and staffed by volunteers. Residents come in to talk; kids find a safe haven to do homework after school. * * *
Detroit:
Introduced mini-stations in the 1970s, but downhill since. The recent chief was convicted of embezzlement, and officers of beating a motorist to death. In that environment, reform is difficult. *
Los Angeles:
A bit of effort in the mid-1980s; nothing since. Viewed millions paid in civil brutality suits as a cost of doing business: cheaper to be feared than to hire more cops. Hopeful sign in new chief Willie Williams. *
Atlanta:
Ex-chief Lee Brown (now Clinton’s drug “czar”) and his successor George Napper made Atlanta one of five cities experimenting with community-oriented policing. When Napper left, commitment waned. *
Chicago
made modest efforts decades ago, and Boston some in recent years, but neither has much to show for it. 1/2
Houston:
Lee Brown was here, too; then his rivals took over and started dismantling what he had done. No donuts
San Francisco:
Community-policing experts have never heard of this town. No donuts

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate