Splendor in the Trash

Forget about Home Depot, eco-savvy home decorators are heading to the junkyard.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Linda Levitsky became what she calls “Martha Stewart on the cheap” the hard way. A couple of years ago, all of Levitsky’s belongings were destroyed when the roof of a storage room collapsed. “I was flat broke,” she recalls. Levitsky headed to Urban Ore, a Berkeley, Calif., reuse center. There, among the inventory of rejects, she found enough “stuff” to fill her entire home and discovered a hidden talent.

Today, Levitsky is an interior designer who uses only found goods. In her hands, the warped, damaged, and busted get a new lease on life. Hand-painted signs from defunct cafés become wall decorations, antique lighting sconces turn into candleholders, and a rusty lobster trap is now perfect for drying flowers. “It’s like being a kid on a scavenger hunt,” says Levitsky. And it’s cheap, too. She did one home for $400.

Levitsky is part of a new industry burgeoning in cities across the United States. Composed of reuse yards and salvage experts, these savvy scavengers are turning trash into cash. Urban Ore, which grossed $1.4 million in 1995, is one of the nation’s largest. Each year it sells for reuse 3,500 tons of “garbage” pulled from the Berkeley waste stream. Urban Ore’s customers include homeowners, contractors, landscapers, artists, and students.

Treasure-seekers can find anything in salvage, including the kitchen sink. Case in point: Annie Berthold-Bond got an entire kitchen from a Vermont salvage company when the original owners discarded it for a younger model. Berthold-Bond had the whole ensemble–from its imported English cabinets down to the cutting boards–transported to her upstate New York home.

“It was a bit of a jigsaw puzzle when it first came, but we made it fit,” says Berthold-Bond, who otherwise couldn’t have afforded to renovate. She gleefully estimates the original price at $40,000. Her price? $3,000, including installation.

Will landfill-inspired homes soon find their way into the pages of Architectural Digest? “It will be a long time before they’re ever interested,” says environmentalist David Goldbeck, co-author of Choose to Reuse, a guide to reuse businesses and services. Nonetheless, Goldbeck says he is encouraged by the growth of the industry and has no qualms about the fact that most people’s incentive is economic, not environmental. “The point is, it keeps things out of the landfill.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate