Image: Tim Carroll

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A purse snatcher in California is required to wear tap shoes so people can hear him coming. A wife batterer in Ohio must allow his wife to spit in his face. Dubbed “formal shaming,” these creative sentences—usually performed in front of probation or parole officers—are a throwback to the 17th century, when criminals faced their community from stocks in the town square. Their growing popularity stems from prison overcrowding and public demands for a more effective judicial system—and, some say, from a desire for old-fashioned revenge.

DATE 1990 OFFENDER Steven Dodd WHERE Onalaska, Texas CRIME Abducted his children during a custody battle SENTENCE INCLUDED Driving 91 miles each way to the mounted police stables in Houston, where he shoveled manure for 20 hours a month for six years.

DATE 1996 OFFENDER William Frazier WHERE Memphis, Tenn. CRIME Sprayed his wife with lighter fluid during an argument while he was lighting the barbecue SENTENCE INCLUDED Delivering a sermon to his congregation about his crime and the importance of learning to control one’s temper.

DATE 1996 OFFENDER Joel Witwer WHERE Houston CRIME Spousal abuse SENTENCE INCLUDED Apologizing to his wife over a loudspeaker from the steps of City Hall at noon, in front of women’s groups and the media.

DATE 1997 OFFENDER Takeisha Brunson WHERE Fort Pierce, Fla. CRIME Bought marijuana with her children (ages 6 and 2) in the car SENTENCE INCLUDED Running an ad in a local paper that featured her picture with the caption: “I was convicted of buying drugs in the presence of my children.”

DATE 1997 OFFENDER Daniel Alvin WHERE Hinesville, Ga. CRIME Organized and accepted money for a bogus bus trip to a basketball game SENTENCE INCLUDED Circling the county courthouse wearing a sign reading: “I am a convicted thief.”

DATE 1997 OFFENDER Michael Hubacek WHERE Houston CRIME Killed two people while driving drunk SENTENCE INCLUDED Carrying a sign at the scene of the accident once a month reading: “I killed two people here while driving drunk”; keeping pictures of the victims in his wallet; volunteering in a hospital’s emergency room on weekend nights; watching an autopsy of a person killed in a similar accident; speaking to youth groups; and placing birthday flowers on the victims’ graves.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate