The World Wild Web

Add a new hazard to the forces threatening the globe’s rarest creatures: the Internet.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The blue Lear’s macaw, a type of parrot with striking indigo plumage, is one of the rarest animals in the world; an estimated 150 remain in the wild, most of them living in a single canyon in northeastern Brazil. Capturing or selling the birds is strictly illegal under Brazilian law and inter-national wildlife treaties. Yet an enterprising collector can acquire a Lear’s macaw through the same system that puts out-of-print books and antique table linens at the fingertips of collectors worldwide—a growing online network of specialized chat rooms, auctions, and retail sites.

An ad for a blue macaw (asking price: $60,000) was one of some 5,000 listings on the Internet for rare and endangered animals from Brazil discovered by Renctas, a Brazilian organization that monitors the illegal wildlife trade. In a recent study, the group concluded that the Internet has revolutionized the international traffic in rare and endangered creatures like the Satanic leaf-tailed gecko, the albino monocle cobra, and the Komodo dragon. “It was like being in some kind of animal supermarket,” Renctas’ director, Dener Giovanini, recalls. “We never imagined that the trade on the Internet would be as serious as this.”

Giovanini says the Web has boosted demand for illegal animals and changed the way traffickers do business: Some, he notes, place specific orders with their procurers based on requests from online customers. Because deals initiated over the Internet are often consummated via phone and fax, the group was not able to pinpoint how much money is spent each year on online animal trafficking. According to the international police agency Interpol, the worldwide trade in rare creatures is worth $5 billion a year.

“Traffickers realize that by selling their products in cyberspace not only do they reach a lot more people, but they don’t come under any one country’s jurisdiction,” says Crawford Allan, global enforcement officer for the watchdog group traffic International. “Because of this, they can escape prosecution even if their crimes have been detected.”

Ernest Mayer, chief of special operations for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, says he is particularly concerned about the Web’s potential to attract new sellers and buyers, sometimes turning casual collectors into international smugglers. After prodding from the agency, the online auction giant eBay issued warnings against selling rare animals and animal parts, but federal agents still find users posting offers for everything from eagle feathers to a frozen tiger cub.

For enforcement agencies, there is one upside to the Internet trade: If buyers and sellers can prowl the Web for their quarry, so can investigators. One recent Fish and Wildlife case involved a trio of reptile enthusiasts in Arizona and Australia who met in a chat room and proceeded to exchange snakes packaged in cookie tins and potato-chip bags. The Arizona collectors were caught when they offered some of their Australian reptiles for sale in the chat room, which happened to be monitored by an informant. “They didn’t try to hide things at all,” says federal agent Kathryn Looney. “They even included a phone number on the bottom of the ad.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate