An Engineered Controversy

Farmers fear that genetically altered tobacco will contaminate their crops.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Jimmy Hill has been raising tobacco since he harvested his first crop as a high- school freshman in 1950. With his 360 acres in eastern North Carolina bringing in more than $1 million a year, he’s the kind of farmer who tends to support scientific advances designed to create more profitable plants. So it comes as something of a surprise that Hill and other growers are not pleased at the news that a manufacturer is about to market the world’s first cigarette made from tobacco that has been genetically engineered.

In March, Vector Tobacco plans to introduce a new line of cigarettes that have been genetically altered to reduce nicotine. With only trace amounts of nicotine at what it claims are nonaddictive levels, Vector says its new product can help smokers control the habit while reducing smoking-related illness. “We think there is potentially a very big market for these,” says Vector spokes-man Paul Caminiti.

But while the cigarettes may be good news for smokers, they have effectively turned Hill and other tobacco farmers into anti-GE activists. Their concern is not as much for the health of smokers as for the health of their market: Growers fear that genetically engineered tobacco will commingle in the fields with traditional varieties, creating hybrids that could not be sold overseas.

In Asia and Europe, which buy roughly half of North Carolina’s leaf, environmental protests have prompted bulk purchasers to reject any shipments containing genetically altered material.

“What’s the point of losing 50 percent of the market just to have Vector grow 4 or 5 million pounds of tobacco?” asks Hill, voicing the concern of many farmers. “We have to close the door.”

The GE tobacco even has Big Tobacco switching sides in the debate over genetic engineering. “A lot of companies like Philip Morris are rejecting buying genetically modified tobacco, afraid if it gets into the chain with other tobacco, it could ruin what’s left of the tobacco industry,” says Charlie Zink of the Farm Service Agency in Madison County, North Carolina.

Pressure from the state prompted Vector to grow its first genetically modified crop in the nontraditional tobacco states of Mississippi, Iowa, Louisiana, and Illinois. Amish farmers, who traditionally shun modern technology, are also raising the controversial crop in Pennsylvania.

In addition, growers in North Carolina tried to prevent Vector from opening a plant to manufacture the altered cigarettes in the town of Roxboro. They backed a bill in the state legislature that would have required companies dealing with genetically altered or “experimental” tobacco to carry $1 million in liability to ensure that no GE leaf inadvertently winds up mixed in with cigarettes that are shipped overseas. “We were concerned it might get commingled with other tobacco,” explains state Rep. Dewey Hill, who sponsored the measure.

Hill eventually withdrew his bill after he was called to a meeting with the governor and Bennett LeBow, the CEO of the tobacco firm’s parent company, Vector Group. LeBow assured Hill that production of the altered cigarettes would be kept separate from its GE-free brands. But the company, which primarily produces discount brands, remains vague about how it will prevent contamination. Asked how Vector would segregate the processing of its nicotine-free cigarette from another brand produced at its Roxboro plant, the company says only that it remains a “high priority.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate