Party Favors

New campaign finance rules haven’t stopped lobbyists from bankrolling lavish fetes at the conventions.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The organizers of the “Good Ol’ Honky Tonk Salute” are throwing a down-home
affair—with barbecue, blue jeans, and country music—in honor of Rep. Joe Barton
(R-Texas), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. They’re holding
it hundreds of miles from Barton’s Dallas congressional district in a Manhattan
banquet hall during this summer’s Republican National Convention. According to an
energy industry lobbyist, the party’s hosts—who paid $20,000 a pop to help cover
the expenses—include the Nuclear Energy Institute, the National Mining
Association, and the power companies’ trade association, the Edison Electric
Institute, all of which have closely followed Barton’s work on the latest energy
legislation. “He’s a longtime friend,” says the lobbyist.

Friend, indeed. The McCain-Feingold campaign finance law was supposed to end such
corporate-sponsored shindigs, prohibiting lawmakers from soliciting contributions
for their convention events. The law didn’t, however, bar “friends” from
independently hosting such events on behalf of members of Congress. And it didn’t
outlaw senators and representatives from throwing convention fundraisers for
their favorite charities. So in both New York and Boston, the site of the
Democratic convention, these affairs have become yet another way for lobbyists to
curry favor with legislators. The event planners are trying to make a splash with
exclusive dinners, late-night parties at trendy clubs, and concerts with the
Boston Pops and Lynyrd Skynyrd. “The convention parties are about influence and
ego,” says W. Michael House, chairman of the legislative practice at Hogan &
Hartson, one of Washington, D.C.’s biggest lobbying firms.

For instance, Linda Bond, a party planner for Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist
(R-Tenn.), faxed a memo to lobbyists last fall, warning that his convention
party’s “success is hugely important to Senator Frist.” The September 1 gala at
Rockefeller Center features a concert, a general reception, and a VIP reception
showcasing “all of the Senator’s Republican Senate Colleagues,” the memo notes. A
$250,000 gift brings 10 tickets to the VIP event, 50 tickets to the general
reception and concert, and entrée to another VIP event with Frist at the
convention itself. The proceeds go to a foundation established by Frist, World of
Hope, which will divvy the post-party money among five global AIDS relief groups.

Another convention-related event that could have lobbyists lining up at the door
is the August 30 “Salute to the Financial Services Committee,” which benefits a
charity affiliated with Rep. Michael Oxley (R-Ohio), the chairman of the House
Financial Services Committee. A party planner says that Oxley’s bash is at the
Rainbow Room atop Rockefeller Center and that Frank Sinatra Jr. will be
performing. The organizers are asking for donations of up to $100,000 to the
American Council for Excellence and Opportunity, which supports “programs that
encourage and support free market philosophies.” Oxley is the group’s honorary
chairman. Like all the charity-hosted events, the corporate contributions not
only cover the party costs but are tax-deductible.

The Democratic convention also has its share of partying. According to one
Democratic fundraiser, who spoke on condition of anonymity, Senator Ted Kennedy
(Mass.) is being feted by eight “friends” throwing in $100,000 each for a private
concert by the Boston Pops, which will perform a composition by John Williams,
composer of the Star Wars theme. The gaming and mining industries are throwing a
lunch for 40 people on July 26 in honor of Senator Harry Reid (Nev.), the
Senate’s Democratic whip, according to Walton Chalmers, vice president of the
American Gaming Association. And while Senator John Breaux (La.) is retiring this
year, that hasn’t stopped him from continuing with plans for a reprise of his
Mardi Gras bash from the convention four years ago. This one will be at the New
England Aquarium, with performances by Ziggy Marley and Buckwheat Zydeco. One of
the event’s organizers, Wayne Smith, a former Breaux chief of staff now lobbying
for RJ Reynolds and Union Pacific, says that hosts are being asked to donate as
much as $50,000 for a party costing up to a half-million dollars.

The conventions weren’t always so flush with corporate money. “The thing is out
of control,” says House, the Hogan & Hartson lobbyist. At the 1980 Democratic
convention, he recalls, there was a small party financed by lobbyists, but
another such event was not held among the Democrats until the 1988 convention in
Atlanta. “Then the lobbyists said, ‘Hey, man, this is a great way to work
members,'” House says. Over the next 12 years, corporations upped their spending
on increasingly lavish affairs for members of Congress at both parties’
conventions. “1996 was hot, 2000 was obscene, and 2004 is going to be even
worse,” House adds.

The excess has sparked a backlash, fueled by such campaign watchdog groups as
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and Democracy 21. In May,
under attack from critics, Celebrations for Children, a charity affiliated with
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas), canceled a week’s worth of
convention-related festivities honoring the congressman. Around the same time,
the insurance giant AFLAC called off its plans for a charity-benefit concert,
“Rockin’ on the Dock of the Bay,” in honor of eight Southern Democratic senators.

Still, many lobbyists view these events as a golden opportunity. One politico
actually organized a seminar in March for inside-the-Beltway lobbyists on how to
throw convention parties in New York. According to the Washington Post, the
invitation to the event advised, “Tens of millions of dollars will be spent by
your clients and competitors during the GOP convention in New York.… Lasting
impressions will be made; connections, branding and marketing opportunities
created; and residual relationships formed.”

At the Republican convention, relationship building begins on Sunday, August 29,
with a Lynyrd Skynyrd concert for senators Lindsey Graham (S.C.) and Saxby
Chambliss (Ga.) and several other Southern congressional Republicans. The
sponsors include the Edison Electric Institute and the electric power company
Southern Co., both of which gave $50,000, and Deloitte & Touche, an accounting
firm, which contributed $25,000. “People in politics are going to be at these
events,” says Brandon Winfrey, a Republican fundraiser who is organizing the
concert. “They are going to have fun; they are going to want to thank somebody.
And whom are they going to be thankful to? The sponsors.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate