Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Interviews conducted by:

Josh Clark, Michael Krasny, and Jay Walljasper.

Statistical research by Leora Broydo. Timeline by Nora E. Connell. Lani Guinier interview by Lise Funderburg.

What did our interviewers have to say about the past 20 years? After they’d listened to dozens of others, we turned the mike on them:

Josh Clark is an associate producer of documentaries for WGBH public television, Boston.

“In working recently on a documentary about Andrew Carnegie and 19th-century industrialism, I explored a period of greed, of rapidly growing wealth inequality, of painful structural changes in the economy, of a frustrated labor movement, and of unethical business dealings born from an absence of regulation. I found it surprisingly good preparation for my next project, a documentary about the Reagan years.” (The Carnegie documentary will premiere next fall on PBS.)

Michael Krasny is a professor of English at San Francisco State University, a host of the award-winning “Forum” radio show on KQED, and a Mother Jones contributing writer.

“Twenty years ago Mother Jones was new. ‘The magazine for the rest of us,’ it called itself. The rest of us are 20 years older now, with more to conserve, and therefore mostly less radical. But who are we? A magazine with as many years as this one has created many friends, built up a lot of capital. It’s pissed people off, created enemies. The redoubtable Camille Paglia let me know right off, ‘I’ll do this interview for you, Michael, but I loathe Mother Jones. I detest them. They are unconscionable.’ Yet the magazine still opens doors. Kindles fond progressive linked memories and real admiration. Inspires trust.

“Certain themes emerged despite the fact that I talked with poets, economists, columnists, ecologists, feminists, politicians, novelists, psychoanalysts, editors, publishers, the left and the right. For many, what we need to learn is seen as a matter of self-interest. Poet Gary Snyder and Harper’s editor Lewis Lapham both spoke of our need to find a new American story. I realized the ‘we’ they were talking about truly is ‘the rest of us,’ those of us trying to hear or tell the story so it makes some sense and follows a path that tells us who we are by looking back on who we were and considering who we might become.”

Jay Walljasper is editor at large at Utne Reader.

“Twenty years ago I believed a great progressive upsurge was just around the corner. What happened? Progressives vastly underestimated the political will of America’s privileged classes to protect and expand their economic power, including rubbing salt in the wounds of racial strife-as Ronald Reagan, George Bush, and Newt Gingrich have done. At the same time, the American left largely ignored its historical strength: a genuine concern and understanding for the everyday lives of everyday people.

Where do we go from here? Some political observers point in the direction of thinking Green-not just in the strict environmental sense, but in the more encompassing philosophy embraced by Europe’s Green parties. They emphasize community over bureaucracy, quality of life over economic growth, real-life

experience over abstract theory, local over multinational, sustainability over consumerism, spirituality over materialism, democratic participation over corporate rule, and human comfort over institutional efficiency.”

Victor Juhasz, who illustrated the interviewees for this piece, created his first Mother Jones cover illustration-of Ronald Reagan-in 1981. He thinks the most important change in the past 20 years is the fax.

Special thanks to: David Beers, Chris Johnson, John Judis, R. Taggart Murphy, Robert Schaeffer, William Smock, Mollie Tremain, and Daniel Yankelovich.

Special design assistance by Lori Reed. Additional research by Dee Dee Bollong.

Sources for statistics, listed by trend: 1. Matrix Information and Directory Services, Personal Communications Industry Association, Information Technology Industry Council, Goddard Space Flight Center 2. Visa International, Global Trends-The World Almanac of Development and Peace (New York: Continuum, 1994) 3. U.S. Department of Commerce, American Bankers Association 4. Center for Defense Information, Vital Signs 1995 (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1995), United Nations, Freedom House 5. Vital Signs 1995 6. Vital Signs 1995, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service 7. 1995 World Almanac (New Jersey: Funk & Wagnalls, 1995), National Association of Home Builders of the United States, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 8. U.S. Bureau of the Census 9. Common Cause, Federal Election Commission, Washington Post, Gallup Organization, Lou Harris & Associates 10. Gallup Organization, Council for Excellence in Government, Newspaper Association of America 11. Walt Disney Co., Information Technology Industry Council, American Society for Reproductive Medicine 12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Education 13. Vital Signs 1995 14. Office of National Health Statistics 15. Statistical Record of Women Worldwide (Detroit: Gale Research Inc., 1995), U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 16. U.S. Bureau of the Census 17. U.S. Bureau of the Census 18. Gallup Organization, World Almanac 1995 19. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Promise Keepers, California Department of Motor Vehicles 20. Gallup Organization, New Editions.

Timeline sources: Chronicle of America (New York: Dorling Kindersley Publishing, 1995), 1995 World Almanac; Britannica Book of the Year, (Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 1975-1995).

Research assistance provided by Lexis-Nexis.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate