MoJo 400: Top Ten

Bald ambition: a look at the power elite who top this year’s list. Click on any of these folks’ dollar totals to see an itemized list of their donations.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


No. 1
Richard M. and Helen DeVos
Grand Rapids, Mich.,
$1,019,000
Richard M. DeVos, 72, is the founder of Amway Corp. Helen DeVos is a philanthropist. (See “Tough Sell“)

Photo by Chip Fox/ Philadelphia Inquirer

No. 2
Peter L. Buttenwieser
Last year’s rank: No. 94, Philadelphia, Pa.,
$610,000
A wealthy philanthropist, Buttenwieser, 62, made waves last year when he claimed that former Clinton-Gore fundraiser Terry McAuliffe hit him up for a donation in exchange for an “intimate luncheon” with the president. McAuliffe responded by calling Buttenwieser a “kook” in Mother Jones (“Big Game Hunter,” May/June 1997).

“It’s not a terrible thing to be called a kook,” Buttenwieser says now. “I wasn’t comfortable with the quid pro quo offer; it’s not the way I operate.”

Buttenwieser spent 10 years as a school principal in inner-city Philadelphia and now helps charitable foundations design education reform programs. He’s a true-blue Democrat. “It’s a very important year for Democrats,” he says, “and I’m very anxious to do everything I can to help us…retake the Senate in 2000.”

No. 3
Bernard L. and Irene Schwartz
Last year’s rank: No. 1, New York, N.Y.,
$555,000
Schwartz, 72, is the CEO of Loral Space & Communications.

By the end of last summer, no fewer than 10 congressional committees and subcommittees were investigating whether the Clinton administration’s policy of allowing aerospace company Loral Space & Communications to launch satellites in China had helped advance Beijing’s own missile technology research program. Following the scent, the media has focused its attention on the unfortunate object of the president’s affections, Bernard L. Schwartz, the slight, bald, septuagenarian CEO of Loral.

Schwartz has given Democrats $1.4 million since 1991, during the Clinton years, and was a member of the Mother Jones 400 well before he became mired in this scandal (he ranked No. 1 last year). As Mother Jones reported last year, he was honored on his 71st birthday with a private White House dinner. It’s because of this access, Clinton’s critics suggest, that the president rubber-stamped Loral’s launches in China — even after Loral apparently ignored security procedures in 1996 by faxing Beijing a draft report about a Chinese rocket crash that destroyed a Loral satellite.
(See “Heavy Metal“)

No. 4
Carl H. and Edyth Lindner
Last year’s rank: No. 55, Cincinnati, Ohio,
$536,000
Lindner, 79, is the CEO of Chiquita Brands International. (See “Banana Split“)

Photo by David L. Ryan/ Boston Globe

No. 5
John Childs
Last year’s rank: No. 104, Boston, Mass.,
$383,000
“My theory,” Childs, 57, told the Boston Globe in 1995, “has generally been: Don’t talk to people and they won’t write about you.” In 1994 Childs reportedly pocketed $20 million when the investment firm he then worked for, Thomas H. Lee Co., brokered a deal by which Quaker Oats bought Snapple for $1.7 billion. He is mum about why he gives so much money to Republicans.

Photo by Sherman Zent/ Palm Beach Post

No. 6
S. Daniel Abraham
Last year’s rank: No. 12, West Palm Beach, Fla.,
$353,500
Among the thousands of pages of files released by the White House and the Democratic National Committee last year amid allegations of questionable fundraising practices is a memo that reads, “Ask Danny for $100K.” It was a “call memo” prepared by top DNC officials for either the president or vice president, and “Danny” is S. Daniel Abraham, 73, founder of Slim-Fast. He is chair of Thompson Medical, and one of the Democratic Party’s most loyal contributors.

No. 7
Alan D. Solomont and Susan Lewis
Last year’s rank: No. 370, Weston, Mass.,
$321,750
Solomont, 49, is a health care consultant and was finance chair of the Democratic National Committee for 1997.

Photo by Frank Ockenfels/ Outline

No. 8
Julian H. Jr. and Josephine Robertson
Last year’s rank: No. 64, New York, N.Y.,
$313,000
Robertson, 66, heads Tiger Management, one of the world’s largest hedge funds, and clearly favors the Republicans’ more business-friendly financial policies. But his heart — or at least his wife, Josephine’s — apparently belongs to dance. In September, Robertson donated $25 million to the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts as a surprise for her.

No. 9
Orin Kramer
Last year’s rank: No. 24, Fort Lee, N.J.,
$288,250
Kramer, 53, who owns the investment firm Kramer Spellman, has served as an aide to presidents Carter and Clinton and has a soft spot for the environment: He wrote a book titled Cleaning Up Hazardous Waste: Is There a Better Way? He also has a soft spot for the president, telling the Bergen County (N.J.) Record: “I’m a strong supporter of the president and I am a strong supporter of the principle that the president should not be bankrupt by the prosecutorial political process.”

No. 10
David and Sylvia Steiner
Last year’s rank: No. 85, West Orange, N.J.,
$280,370
Real estate mogul David Steiner, 68, is vice chair of the Washington, D.C.-based National Jewish Democratic Council. He hosted the Clintons for a fundraising dinner last February and recently told the New York Times that Clinton’s problems would not deter his fundraising efforts, saying: “There are always some people who are not going to give, but the core group is going to continue to support the party.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate