MotherJones JF93: Ballooning statistics

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As part of his six-month stint abroad every year, Brice Atkinson, a contractor at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), surveys health officials to determine how many times a country’s typical couple has sex.

Atkinson belongs to a staff of demographers, health officials, economists, sociologists, and private contractors who spent nearly $40 million in 1991 distributing 842,106,000 condoms to the developing world for family planning and AIDS prevention. The number of condoms each country received is based on a survey of its coital frequency rate. Although the generally accepted average is 100 times per year, in a recent compilation, Brazil topped the list with an average CFR of 97; Ghana was at the bottom with 14.

“In every country the men feel that they are unique and that they make love more frequently or their penises are larger and longer,” Atkinson says. “If you ask a guy how many times he’s had sex in a week he’ll usually say seven. The surveyor writes that number down and then quickly asks, ‘How many times have you had sex this week?’ The man will respond something like, ‘Well, this week only twice because I had a cold.’ We can be pretty sure that the second number is more accurate.”

The irony surrounding USAID’s overseas family-planning programs is that they would never be accepted domestically. During election years especially, agency officials worry themselves sick that a Jesse Helms or a Bill Dannemeyer will take an interest in their work.

“Birth control is less controversial abroad,” says population office director Duff Gillespie. “There are blinking billboards encouraging vasectomies, a soccer team with a stylized rubber as a mascot, and full-page condom ads in newspapers.”

USAID condoms come in two sizes. “The 49s and 52s (mm in diameter) have served us well,” says another agency official, Carl Hemmer. Forty-niners are distributed to Asian countries, and the 52s are offered everywhere else. “That’s traditional judgment more than scientific,” Hemmer adds.

Now there’s a proposal by a foreign manufacturer for 55s. “We don’t have fitting salons,” Hemmer says. “The size debate is measuring male egos rather than other parts of the anatomy.”

The size issue caused a brouhaha recently in Italy, when Health Minister Francesco de Lorenzo announced that the smallest regulation size for condoms sold in Italy was larger than in the rest of Europe. The newspaper Il Giornale blared, “At least Italy is maxi in something,” while L’Unita, the newspaper of the former Communist Party, suggested that foreigners might want to bring their own condoms when visiting. De Lorenzo later retracted his statement when it was discovered that Italy’s condoms were the same as those everywhere else.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate