MotherJones ND93: Cat’s big secret: killer forklifts

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


For years Tom LaJuenesse was one of Caterpillar Inc’.s best weapons against forklift liability suits. As the company’s manager of product safety and ecology in the forklift division, he debunked legal claims that seat belts were necessary to prevent serious injury or death. Despite his courtroom prowess, however, in May 1987 he was mysteriously removed from all legal cases.

He left behind little more than a doctor’s statement claiming that legal proceedings would be “inadvisable” because of his poor health. What the note didn’t say was that LaJuenesse had lost both his legs while doing tests on a forklift.

Forklifts are notoriously dangerous. Transportation & Distribution, an industry trade magazine, reported approximately 42,000 accidents involving forklifts in 1990. Government statistics and industry literature show that tip-overs have been the primary cause of classifiable forklift deaths over the years, and published studies verifying forklift instability have been available since 1957.

Commonly counterweighted to balance heavy loads, empty forklifts can be dangerously unsteady, with even moderate turns initiating tip- overs. Worse, a forklift tends to fall slowly at first, deceiving the operator into thinking there’s time to jump to safety. But moments later the forklift slams to the ground like a mousetrap, catching the operator and all too often causing dismemberment, crushing injury, or death. A seat belt would keep the operator in the protective cab, increasing his or her chances of surviving unharmed.

For years, as a defense strategy, Caterpillar had aggressively opposed the need for seatbelts through the testimony of people like Tom LaJuenesse. But in 1987 while he was conducting driving tests for an upcoming trial, LaJuenesse turned the forklift and felt it suddenly pitch to the side. He was thrown from the vehicle and caught beneath it as it fell. Several years later, when California lawyer Alfred Lombardo obtained a court order for LaJuenesse (under a state law requiring employers to make their employees available for testimony), he suddenly retired. Lombardo tried to pursue him into his home state, but the doctor’s statement got in the way.

In 1989, Caterpillar manager and expert witness Thomas DeBuhr admitted to LaJuenesse’s accident but said he was unaware of any audio/video records. But in 1990, lawyers uncovered not only evidence, but witnesses. Engineer Jeffrey Hodgson had been with LaJuenesse; Hodgson’s son was videotaping the driving tests when the accident occurred. Hodgson later testified that he turned the tape over to Caterpillar. It was then “discarded” with other legal files when the case LaJuenesse had been preparing closed–despite a 1986 court order stating that a Caterpillar subsidiary was not to destroy any accident evidence in a similar case. The company had already been fined $776,000 by Occupational Safety and Health Administration in 1987 for violating government rules on reporting industrial injuries. When asked for a response to accusations that Caterpillar had attempted to cover up LaJuenesse’s accident, a company spokesman would only say, “These complaints were handled in open court.” But he didn’t know–and wouldn’t find out–which court case.

By the time news of LaJuenesse’s accident began to leak out, Caterpillar had started offering seat belts on most of its forklifts and seat-belt “retrofit” packages for older vehicles. But lawyers accuse the company of not pushing these packages aggressively enough. Caterpillar says its information on the sale of retrofit packages is unavailable, since the company was taken over by Mitsubishi last year. But an industry analyst estimates that some sixty thousand Caterpillar forklifts potentially without seat belts could still be in use in the U.S. alone.

Last year, a California jury awarded Joseph Kochetta $2.4 million in a product-liability case against Caterpillar. In 1988 Kochetta was using a 1976 forklift in the paved parking lot outside of a rock-processing plant. The truck tipped over, pinning Kochetta and crushing his pelvis. Trapped for hours before he was found, Kochetta cracked his teeth from gritting in pain. Although they only had one Caterpillar forklift, his employers were unaware that a retrofit package existed, and even after the accident, Caterpillar failed to notify them about the availability of seat belts for their workers.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate