Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As we head into the home stretch of 1993, California Governor Pete Wilson is emerging as a dark horse candidate for evil American politician of the year. Now, evil is not a word to be used lightly, and its application to a moderate, seemingly rational Republican sounds harsh, even hysterical. But Wilson’s rationality is feigned, and a thin veil for his malice.

To recap: On August 9th, Wilson called a press conference to publicize a letter he was faxing to President Clinton “on behalf of the people of California.” The letter claimed that a massive influx of illegal immigrants lured by welfare was forcing financially strapped states to deny services to their own citizens. Wilson’s top solution: “Urge Congress to approve a Constitutional amendment to deny citizenship to children born in the U.S. to illegal immigrant parents.”

The political power of such scapegoating shouldn’t be underestimated. Wilson’s approval rating, previously at a low for any modern California governor, shot up after his media blitz. California’s centrist and liberal senators, Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, were quick to declare that they, too, favor a hard line against illegals.

Almost everyone, of course, is against illegal immigration. It’s corrosive to have laws you can’t enforce. Furthermore, wanting to slow down legal immigration doesn’t make one a racist. Societies naturally have periods (usually coinciding with high unemployment) when they feel they need to limit immigration.

Wilson’s racism begins (and his rationality ends) with his attribution of shiftlessness as motive. Immigrants (legal and illegal) don’t come here seeking welfare, they come looking for jobs. Wilson knows this. As a U.S. senator he sponsored an amendment on behalf of growers allowing them to import extra “guest workers.” Immigrants, whatever their legal status, are generally optimistic, hardworking, adaptive people willing to do the jobs that residents won’t touch. Economic studies show that they give far more to the economy than they take away.

To strip citizenship from the U.S.-born children of illegals (or to deprive them of public schooling, another Wilson suggestion) is not only unconstitutional, it’s stupid. The few people discouraged from immigrating would be far outnumbered by those who would come anyway, but once here might feel they had no stake in a society where their families were permanently disenfranchised.

Wilson is attacking the American dream. Consider General Shalikashvili, the new chairman of the Joint Chiefs, who immigrated here with his parents at age sixteen. The general’s father served as a major in the German SS Waffen and lied about this when immigrating. A clear, documented violation. Punish the son, Wilson says. He would transform our legal principle of citizenship by soil to citizenship by blood. The German system.

I recently visited Germany, where the question of outsiders is very much in the air. Especially in the East, the euphoria of unification has been replaced by self-pity. Do you know who made the East Germans accept Soviet totalitarianism? Who forced them to rat on one another? Who, some believe, are responsible for the economic and moral poverty that now plagues them? The Turkish guest workers in West Germany, of course.

Pete Wilson’s evil isn’t neo-Nazism, but it is anti-Americanism. One of the charges in our Declaration of Independence was that King George was “obstructing the laws for the naturalization of foreigners, refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither.” The Founding Fathers envisioned a country without status distinctions based upon heredity. Why does Jefferson’s first self-evident truth– “that all men are created equal”–evoke national pride today despite his omission of women and his acceptance of slavery? Because the phrase implies that the distinctions between people are largely of our own creation, and that a widening gap is a cause for dismay.

Wilson’s letter may have been the first volley in what will become an ugly campaign against immigrants. Emboldened by his rise in the polls, the governor wrote another public letter to President Clinton in September urging that California become the test state to require tamper-proof identification cards certifying citizenship. Obviously this will jolt our economy out of its recession!

Pete Wilson doesn’t care about the state or the future; he’s just interested in the state of his future. In the name of rationality, he is stirring up irrational fears, then denying his virulence like a classic Know-Nothing. At an Orange County border patrol checkpoint press conference, Wilson claimed, “I don’t fault the immigrants. If I were down there, I’d undoubtedly be trying to come up here, too.” This false empathy is a thinly disguised warning about the hungry southern horde.

Wilson isn’t on their side–or ours. The governor is trying to incite in us a hostile outward gaze toward “others.” As with the Birchers of the 1950s, who also began in Southern California, the real danger is not that extreme proposals will be enacted, but that they will warp the debate so much that practical, humane solutions to our problems won’t be discussed.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate