Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The town of Hayfork, in Northern California’s remote Trinity County, endured a nasty fire season several years back. Every few weeks–sometimes every few days–crews would race to douse blazes starting in curious places. As Mother Jones reported in “Fire Trail,” by Mike Weiss (March 1993), it seemed likely that someone was intentionally setting Hayfork on fire.

Since the late 1980s, Hayfork (population 2,000) had experienced a devastating economic downturn: The U.S. Forest Service had halted green-timber sales when much of the Trinity National Forest was declared habitat of the endangered spotted owl; six of the seven lumber mills in the Hayfork Valley had closed. Investigators speculated that arsonists might be starting the fires so they could make money putting them out; so loggers could cut down the scorched trees; so mills would have enough timber for their production schedule.

Officials have never proven economic arson in California’s recent history. But last August, a Hayfork transient pled guilty to starting three fires in summer 1992 so he and others could profit by extinguishing them. In exchange for his plea in federal court, 32-year-old Ernest Earl Ellison agreed to help authorities convict the rest of what is believed to be a local arson ring.

Ellison confessed after former mill hand Steve Weinzinger told investigators, and later a federal grand jury, about a business proposition Ellison made to him that summer. Ellison needed a driver to drop him off while he started fires, and then quickly whisk him from the scene. In return, Weinzinger would get $300. “I thought he was joking at the time,” said Weinzinger, who refused.

Ellison is pointing fingers at some of the “pillars of the community,” according to Charles Stevens, the U.S. attorney on the Hayfork case. The investigation now appears to be centering on some owners of water tenders, which transport water to remote stretches of forest. Holding 4,000 to 5,000 gallons, tenders can be highly profitable during a fire: The U.S. Forest Service and the California Department of Forestry pay more than $2,000 a day for a water tender.

According to Stevens, Ellison implicated his brother Jimmy in open court. Jimmy, who co-owns a water tender with Jack Hoaglen, has thus far refused to cooperate with authorities; Hoaglen has been questioned.

Hayfork is not alone. The desperation and greed that prompted some locals to burn their own valley is repeating itself throughout Northern California. “It is my estimation that a full 80 to 90 percent of the forest fires in Northern California in the past few years have been arson for profit,” said Stevens.

Hayfork is unfortunately now on the map as the place where economic arson came out of the closet. Last year, as a result of our story, the community received a federal grant for locals and environmentalists to begin the healing process. More wounds are likely to be reopened in the coming months. The forest can be a community’s livelihood, but that is no reason a few miscreants, thinking that it belongs to them, can get away with arson.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate