HMOs’ Fevered Pitch

A consumer guide to the health insurers’ new, overheated advertising campaigns

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


U.S. Healthcare
Louis Armstrong sings “Got a Lot of Living to Do” as hard bodies surf, dance, and frolic across the screen. A seaside yuppie utopia? No, just the optimum clientele for this fast-growing, very profitable HMO, used by 1.9 million members in the mid-Atlantic states. The ploy: attract customers who will stay healthy. Let’s hope it works, because this HMO spends less on care than any other–72.9 cents of every dollar, instead of the average 78 cents. This creates a healthy bottom line for CEO Leonard Abramson, whose annual $9.8 million tops any other HMO executive’s pay.
HMO Blue of New Jersey
Assorted faces shriek, tonsils flailing, into the camera. A serial killer? Frankenstein? Much worse, the narrator tells us: They see the rising cost of health care. But the ad’s message–managed-care plans cut costs–doesn’t stand up. Industry experts report savings caused by early changes (e.g., reducing hospital stays) are finite, and costs will soar again. Ordinary Americans are already feeling the pinch: Last year, 1.1 million joined the ranks of the 40 million already uninsured. Now that’s scary.
Health Insurance Plan of New York
Lyn Schwan, with her tousled hair and cool cat-eye glasses, praises the “great, great” pediatric care and easy access to the doctors of Gotham’s oldest HMO, which delivers care to 1.1 million members through neighborhood centers. Lyn’s verite testimony is key to HIP’s video facelift. If only it were true. Enrollees of the plan ranked HIP’s quality the lowest of 21 HMOs in an industrywide survey. And unlike Lyn, they gave HIP an “F” for access to their preferred doctor.
Aetna Health Plans
“I am a nurse first, and I am an Aetna employee second,” narrates Jo Glenn. Message: Aetna shares the priorities of this pro-patient nurse. Reality: Managed-care HMOs such as Aetna increasingly use review nurses–who often don’t even meet individual patients–to monitor and second-guess physicians’ treatments. Containing cost is priority number one for these corporate nurses. The Service Employees International Union, which represents nurses, predicts unemployment for hundreds of thousands of hospital nurses because of managed care’s budgeting knife. Jo’s colleagues may soon be out of their jobs.
Secure Horizons
A vibrant 102-year-old named Lula who suffers from diabetes is this Medicare HMO’s too-perfect spokesmodel. In fact, “Lula” is played by an actress who’s just 89, and is based only loosely on a 102-year-old Secure Horizons client named Ernestine. Ernestine doesn’t have diabetes, but rather what one Secure Horizons staffer describes as a “more frightening” condition. And while Lula says that she wanted to join the HMO, Ernestine had to in order to keep her doctor, whose practice was bought by Secure Horizons’ parent company, Pacificare. Lula tells us she is grateful that the HMO accepted her despite her age and her condition. Actually, the HMO did her no special favors: Medicare HMOs are required to accept all applicants.

And it’s only going to become more confusing from here. With government health reform long dead, managed-care plans are engaged in an intense struggle over market share, and only a handful of companies in each region will survive. Let the buyer beware. Stuart Schear is a media fellow of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate