Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


“Population qua population is finished; nobody’s talking about that now,” says Frances Kissling, president of the advocacy group Catholics for a Free Choice. But even so, activists attending the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing are worried about maintaining the gains for women won at last year’s U.N. International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo.

They expect a backlash from the Vatican, which grabbed headlines at Cairo with its stance on abortion and family planning; from conservative countries, such as Malta and Ecuador; and from right-wing women’s groups. Already, conservatives have formally challenged the language agreed upon in Cairo.

Moreover, the new Republican-dominated Congress threatens to cut development assistance, thus jeopardizing the Clinton administration’s commitment to double population funding to $1.2 billion by the year 2000. That’s a big chunk of the $17 billion the U.N. estimates is needed to meet the Cairo goals.

SOME KEY PLAYERS IN THE POPULATION DEBATE

  • A Catholics for a Free Choice. 1436 U St., N.W., Suite 301, Washington, DC, 20009; 202-986-6093. A vocal leader in challenging the Vatican on abortion and family planning for more than 20 years.
  • A Development Alternatives With Women for a New Era. University of the West Indies, School of Continuing Studies, Pinelands, St. Michaels, Barbados; 809-426-9288. This network’s economists, lawyers, and academics are noted for their creative thinking about Third World women’s issues.
  • A Human Life International. 7845 Airpark Rd., Suite E, Gaithersburg, MD 20879; 301-670-7884. These pro-lifers will fight access to contraception and abortion by co-opting the progressive argument that overpopulation is less problematic than the inequitable distribution of wealth.
  • A International Planned Parenthood Federation. Western Region Office. 902 Broadway, 10th floor, New York, NY 10010; 212-995-8887. With offices in 140 countries, this global octopus spends more than $110 million per year on family planning.
  • A The International Women’s Health Coalition. 24 East 21st St., New York, NY, 10010; 212-979-8500. By amplifying the voices of Asian, African, and Latin American partners, IWHC helps steer the debate toward women’s reproductive rights.
  • A Latin American and Caribbean Women’s Health Network. Casilla Postal 50610 Santiago 1, Chile; 56-2-633-4582. In a region clinging to traditional gender roles, these women turn organizing and research into political clout.
  • A Population Action International. 1120 19th St., N.W., Suite 550, Washington, DC 20036; 202-659-1833. One of the strongest voices in the traditional population lobby, PAI has been criticized for supporting aggressive family planning.
  • A United Nations Population Fund. 220 East 42nd St., New York, NY 10017; 212-297-5000. A funder (roughly $200 million per year) of population programs, this U.N. agency led the Cairo consensus and–thanks to director Nafis Sadik–responds to the concerns of Third World women.
  • A U.S. Agency for International Development. 320 21st St., N.W., Room 4889, Washington, DC 20523; 202-647-1850. With the U.S. contributing almost half the world total to population aid, USAID’s shift to “women’s empowerment” could equal big changes. Does USAID mean it?
  • A The Vatican. Holy See Mission to the United Nations, 25 E. 39th St., New York, NY 10016; 212-370-9614. Expect delegates to lead the fight against abortion, family planning, and Western consumption.
  • A Women’s Environment and Development Organization. 845 Third Ave., 15th floor, New York, NY 10022; 212-759-7982. Co-founded by former Congresswoman Bella Abzug, WEDO ran an effective women’s lobby in Cairo and plans a similar caucus in Beijing.

Consulting editor Annie Stine and consulting designer Dian-Aziza Ooka provided considerable help on “In Her Hands.” Research assistance by Mother Jones fellow Liz Enochs and Lexis-Nexis.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate