Reading between the lines

Is Earning By Learning – Like Newt’s Earlier Charities – A Way For His Supporters To Buy Influence?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Newt Gingrich’s Earning by Learning literacy program, which pays inner-city children $2 for every book they read, is his kind of charity. It’s not like those nasty federal help programs, which he describes in his book, To Renew America, as “the government taking billions of dollars from reluctant taxpayers and scattering it among the poor.” His program, he says, is efficient.

It’s also wonderful window dressing. By donating sales generated from book signings to the program, combined with the accompanying press shoots, Gingrich merrily detracts attention from the ongoing probe into House ethics charges against him. At the same time, he gets to promote a program he can trumpet as “thin and nonbureaucratic,” requiring only volunteer adults and “no money.” But it appears that inner-city children aren’t the only ones benefiting. Since 1992, Mel Steely, the program’s guru at West Georgia College, pocketed nearly half of the Georgia programUs $62,000 endowment for his own “fees,” according to The Wall Street Journal. But, calling himself an exception, Steely said critics should examine the programs nationwide to determine the charity’s efficiency.

So we took a look. In Houston, the coordinator of the Earning by Learning program collects an undisclosed salary. In Atlanta, “volunteers” are paid $500 a pop to visit the inner city. And in Denver, the program quietly has budgeted a position that will consume 43 percent of the group’s total budget. The program’s sponsors might also walk away from their experience with more than a warm, fuzzy feeling. Houston’s Earning by Learning program is supported by the Houston Automobile Dealers Association. The program’s co-founder, Charles Smith (who owns an Acura dealership), recently had the opportunity to testify before the House Ways and Means Committee, arguing against the luxury tax, which levies a 10 percent tax on certain auto purchases above $32,000.

Smith says that since becoming involved with Earning by Learning, the dealers association has had frequent access to Gingrich to speak “about industry-related issues, tax-related issues, government- related issues, you name it.”

And what about Earning by Learning’s other humanitarians? A leaked list of the program’s “sponsors” is heavy on conservative activists, elected officials, and party donors, but light on educators and people noted for volunteerism. A sampling:

Joe Barton: Republican congressman from Texas and a top fundraiser for GOPAC.

Don Balfour: Georgia Republican state senator and executive at Waffle House Inc. (which has donated to Gingrich’s campaign and to his Progress & Freedom Foundation).

Melissa Hart: Pennsylvania Republican state representative and founder of the First Freedoms Fund, dedicated to countering the ACLU.

Nancy Goettman: One of Orlando’s leading Christian Coalition activists

Charles Kolb: Dan Quayle’s policy adviser, now legal counsel for United Way of America.

Mike Schwartz: An ex-director at Paul Weyrich’s Free Congress Foundation, he spearheaded the group’s campaign to “put stigma back in divorce”; now a talk show host on the conservative National Empowerment Television.

Marshall Fritz: Spokesperson for the Separation of School & State Alliance, which wants to abolish public schools.

Lawrence Kind: Business manager at Milliken Chemical Co. CEO Roger Milliken has donated $255,000 to GOPAC, and Gingrich devoted more than 20 minutes to Milliken and Co. in his televised college course.

And how does the program compare with other literacy efforts? Andrew McKean–the founder of Denver’s program–proudly estimates that 280 kids will participate next year, and that students will average about $60 (30 books) for the summer, costing a total of $16,800.

Across town, the Denver Public Library involved 30,000 children –a third of all Denver children below the age of 14–in its reading program. Spokeswoman Anya Breitenbach says librarians volunteered their time (without additional compensation) to conduct reading circles, and rewarded children with donated items, such as Colorado Rockies’ baseball cards or tickets to a local amusement park. According to Breitenbach, “It didn’t cost the taxpayers anything.”

Return to Countdown to Indictment

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate