Letters to Paula, JF96

Robert Embick, Dana Point, Calif.:

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


About a year ago, it was announced that Ronald Reagan had come down with a nasty case of Alzheimer’s and they made it sound like it happened overnight. I used to watch his press conferences and felt really embarrassed for him as he stumbled off his script–and that was 10 years ago. It was apparent to everyone at the time that Reagan was suffering from something, but we weren’t told what. Why the cover-up?

A: You’re right. It’s not like the average citizen gasped and said, “How could that be?” when they heard Reagan had Alzheimer’s. Most of us said, “Oh, yeah, I thought something was wrong.”

I talked to a syndicated columnist and political analyst, Mark Shields, who I love–when he worked with David Gergen on the “MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour” they were the Bert (Gergen) and Ernie (Shields) of political analysis. I don’t know if we can hold Mark personally responsible for everything the press does, but he certainly offered a believable explanation of the oversight. He said that Reagan was never any good with specifics.

“It wasn’t,” he said, “as if he was a master of this stuff and it started to slip away. He was never into details. Reagan had only two or three big things that he cared about–unlike Clinton, who can tell you the nutritional value of the school lunch program outside of Kearney, Nebraska.”

Mark also said that, at their core, the press really respect democracy and that Reagan’s election was an enormous surprise to them. It left them wondering if maybe the voters knew something they didn’t. This may have caused a lack of scrutiny.

Johnathon Dunker, e-mail:

Have you ever looked at ways to increase your income?

A: Johnathon, I have considered and rejected the idea of taking things that don’t belong to me. Is that what you mean?

Marisa and Alison Peacock, e-mail:

Is there any specific flower or plant exclusively for Passover?

A: My neighbor, Peter Himmelman, is Jewish and what I call very religious. He wears a yarmulke and a prayer shawl. His son wears a yarmulke. His kids go to shul. They can’t go out to the Koo Koo Roo to eat with my foster kids and me because it’s not kosher (at least they say that’s why they won’t eat with us). At Yom Kippur he and his wife fasted. The kids didn’t fast, but couldn’t wear leather shoes (his 6-year-old explained to me), which makes sense because sometimes when I’m hungry I’ll slip on a leather shoe instead of eating.

Anyway, Peter doesn’t think there’s a Passover flower. You may choose any flower you’d like to celebrate with.

Write Paula c/o Mother Jones, 731 Market Street, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 94103. Fax her at (415) 665-6696; or send e-mail to Paula@motherjones.com.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate