The Ice Man: Harold & Annette Simmons

Under investigation by the SEC, the FBI, and the FTC, this billionaire decided to take on the FEC

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Harold & Annette Simmons: Dallas, Texas, $124,230. Party: R

When, in the late ’80s, corporate takeover artist Harold C. Simmons, 64, found himself under investigation by the SEC, the FBI, and the FTC, he decided to fight back. Simmons told the Los Angeles Times that it was at that point that he “started spending money and doing some lobbying [himself] in Washington. That’s what you’ve got to do to defend yourself.”

The “Ice Man,” as he is known by his corporate colleagues, began to defend himself with such zeal–$125,000 to Gingrich’s GOPAC, $25,000 to Dole’s Better America Fund, etc.–that in 1993 the Federal Election Commission found Simmons guilty of violating federal campaign contribution laws. Specifically, in ’88 and ’89 Simmons exceeded the yearly $25,000 contribution limit. Simmons was fined $19,800, hardly a deterrent to someone whose estimated worth tops $1.8 billion.

Simmons’ most recent giving pattern shows a new strategy: Instead of flagrantly donating more than the $1,000 limit to a single candidate in one election cycle–as Simmons did in 1990 when he gave $6,000 to Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.)–the Ice Man recruits help from his family.

In the 1991-92 campaign cycle, Simmons gave $5,000 each to four of his favorite PACs: NL Industries PAC, Baroid PAC, Contran PAC, and the Small Biz PAC. Simmons’ wife Annette also gave $5,000 each to the four PACs, as did Simmons’ four daughters, Andrea, Serena, Lisa, and Scheryle. All of these contributions were made on the same dates.

And, to make the giving even cozier, Simmons owns three of the four PACs, enabling him to control which candidates get funded by his (and his family’s) money. In the 1993-94 election cycle, for example, the Simmons family and PACs doled out $16,500 to Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-Texas); $7,000 to Sen. Michael DeWine (R-Ohio); and $6,000 to Ollie North, for his failed senatorial campaign in Virginia.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate