Irene Stuber: Raising Hell on the Web

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Last year Irene Stuber took a good look at the World Wide Web and found a man’s world. Amidst the clamor of gun control activists, religious conservatives, progressive political parties — just about any group with a point of view — she found that the women’s side of the story was in danger of going untold. So Stuber, a 67-year-old retired Florida newspaper journalist, launched her own women’s Web nexus, Catt’s Claws, and women’s voices got a little bit louder.

“The same thing was missing on the Internet as was missing in our daily newspapers and news magazines: information about what is happening to women in the U.S. and the world,” says Stuber. “For example, monthly I have been posting information about an abortion pills method that is legal and available today. I post information about condom use, birth control, etc. Each month women write amazed. This may be ‘old’ information, but women don’t have access to it in today’s society.”

In Stuber’s eyes, the new media provided a unique opportunity for women to discuss their local problems and put them into a global perspective. Catt’s Claws set out to do just that.

“While reading our newspapers, we may think ‘Oh my, how awful’ about one murder after a lengthy stalking in our hometown and see it as an isolated miscarriage of justice,” she says. “Catt’s Claws, by showing the same thing is happening in Wyoming, New York, California, Alabama, and Iowa, reveals that there is a pattern of discrimination and abuse of women and children’s rights and safety — an institutionalized abuse that is not being addressed by our government and law enforcement agencies.”

Indeed, Catt’s Claws has been the chronicle of ‘herstory’ on the Web, and has been a source of inspiration to a younger generation of women Web publishers.

Laurie Mann, a 30-something feminist who coordinates the Women Leaders Online Web site, says Stuber is “my role model as I age — an interesting/take-no-prisoners woman who won’t kowtow to anyone and who will grow and change with the times.”

Stuber says that she chose her role model for the same reasons. “That’s why I named my column after Carrie Chapman Catt, who was so single-minded in her drive towards women’s enfranchisement that we got it. She marched into Congress and into the state legislatures and into the White House and confronted men face to face.”

Catt’s Claws is put together by a “cast of thousands,” says Stuber, since much of the content comes from the more than 150 email messages she receives every day. With an invisible budget, (in fact, much of the cost has come out of Stuber’s pocket), the site has a voluntary workforce, comprised of a proofreader, a mailing list administrator, and a Web designer. “My work is limited to gathering the information, writing it, and then sending it to a few people who then do the major distribution,” she says.

Catt’s Claws began as a “protest” against the National Organization for Women’s absence from the Internet, Stuber says. An active member of NOW, she began petitioning them to build a Website in July of 1994. Nothing happened.

“In January of 1995 I said ‘to hell with them’ and launched Catt’s Claws.” Six weeks later, NOW launched their site.

Stuber says that sometimes her family has told her that she “should be sitting on the front porch in a rocking chair instead of in front of a computer screen raising hell with the status quo.”

Let’s take up a collection for a laptop.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate