California Campaign Finance Reform

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Mother Jones already gave you twelve good reasons for campaign finance reform. Here’s just a few more:

  • Senate and House campaigns raised $447.7 million between 1/1/95 and 6/30/96, a 15% increase over the same period in the 1993-94 election cycle. (FEC 8/6/96)

  • Political action committees contributed $78 million to congressional candidates during the first 15 months of the 1995-96 cycle, a 12% increase. (FEC 6/7/96)

  • Corporate PACs contributed $30.7 million to 1996 congressional candidates — more than any other type of PAC. (FEC 6/7/96)

This year, two rival initiatives are fighting to get big money out of California politics. Both measures agree on banning contributions from lobbyists, the transfer of funds between candidates, and the accumulation of surplus campaign funds or “war chests.” But beyond such similarities, they present a tough choice for the reform-minded voter:

The California Political Reform Initiative The Anti-Corruption Act of 1996
Proposition # Proposition 208 Proposition 212
Sponsor Californians for Political Reform Californians Against Political Corruption
Basic Points Individuals, PACs, corporations, and unions limited to $25,000 total yearly contributions.

Contributions to a single candidate limited to $250 for most races, $500 for statewide offices (double for candidates who agree to spending limits).

Voluntary spending limits.

Individuals limited to $2,000 total yearly contributions. Other entities limited to $10,000.

Limits contributions from individuals, PACs, and parties to $100 for most races, $200 for statewide offices.

75% of a candidate’s money must come from within their district.

Mandatory spending limits.

Opposition Viewpoint Prop 208 is less than the major overhaul demanded and needed by Californians. Proposition 212’s $100 contribution limits, mandatory spending limits, and in-district contribution limits will be ruled unconstitutional, effecting no reform at all.

The Web sites for both Prop. 208 and Prop 212 have the full text (Prop. 208 | Prop 212) of their proposition and a host of links to relevant articles and non-profit groups, giving you the opportunity to decide for yourself which one you support.

Each also offer information on how you can volunteer (Prop. 208 | Prop 212), and who the local contactscolor> (Prop. 208 | Prop 212) are in your area.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate