Truth in a jar

Good things don’t always need big packages

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Next time you take out that three-ply, 39-gallon, handle-tie trash sack made from expandomatic plastic developed by NASA, think about this: Frank Schiavo fits two weeks’ worth of garbage in half a paper lunch bag. Schiavo, an environmental studies teacher at San Jose State University, has spent 16 years trying to reach “zero garbage.” He takes his own containers and bags whenever he goes to the market, and when it comes to products with nonreusable packaging, Schiavo has added his own “r” to the reduce, reuse, recycle mantra: refuse. “If it cannot be recycled or composted, don’t buy it,” he says.

The rest of us could do with a pinch of Schiavo’s resolve. Every day the typical American produces 5.2 pounds of garbage. Product packaging is the number one component in the nation’s waste stream, weighing in at nearly 57 million tons per year. That’s 32 percent of all American trash. It’s not surprising, then, that environmentalists are fighting the wrapping racket. In 1991 they helped pressure McDonald’s to trade its foam clamshell hamburger containers for simple paper wraps a move that reduced burger bundling by 80 percent. Now topping their hit list are disposable and single-serving products such as Bisquick Shake ‘n Pour pancake mix, Hawaiian Punch “juice-in-a-box,” and Gillette Good News razors, according to the New York Public Interest Research Group.

Companies that choose to reduce packaging have found the benefits extend beyond Mother Nature to the bottom line. “Part is good citizenship, but it’s also economics,” says Thomas Bowman, Hershey Chocolate’s director of packaging. In 1994, Hershey thinned by 15 percent the piece of cardboard on which Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups rest, resulting in 300,000 pounds less trash and $175,000 in annual savings. Since 1993, Hershey has saved 9 million pounds of packaging through a variety of reductions and the use of recycled, postconsumer cardboard. (And Bowman, no doubt, has received many kisses from the bean counters.)

Another solution to the packaging problem is to buy from bulk bins. Bulk food sections now proliferate at grocery stores such as Whole Foods Market or Bread & Circus, where you can scoop beans, grains, dried fruits, tea, flours, pasta, peanut butter, and oils that are often cheaper and fresher than their wrapped counterparts. Lotions, shampoos, bath salts, and soap also are commonly sold by weight.

But if bulk foods aren’t your bag, you can still be pickier than Martha Stewart in a stencil shop. Buy products packaged in recyclables (your local recycling depot can tell you what’s acceptable). Choose large sizes and eschew products with excess layers. Buy reusable products such as cloth napkins and rechargeable batteries. And take your own mug to the coffee shop for that tall, nonfat mocha to go.

Of course, it’s impossible to avoid packaging altogether. Just peek inside Schiavo’s bag of trash: There’s a Band-Aid, a few windows from envelopes, plastic from the neck of a wine bottle, and a “schnookered-out” sponge.

Nobody’s perfect.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate