The Mother Jones Poll

There were 482 respondents to last week’s poll. Here’s what they had to say, and don’t forget to check out our ten favorite new <a href="/news_wire/soapbox/topten.html">slogans</a> for Dole. Be sure to participate in our latest poll. Also, check out the <a href="poll_archive.html">results</a> of our previous polls.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


1 a. Which of the following is Bob Dole’s campaign slogan?

The majority of the people got it right, “Bob Dole: A better man for a better America” is Bob Dole’s campaign slogan. Here’s how everyone scored:

21% Bob Dole: A better man for a better America

15% A tunnel to the 19th century

13% (no answer given)

12% Just don’t do it

11% I’m a Dull man

9% Fifteen Percent

6% My wife won’t be in charge of anything

3% My dog Leader chews Socks for breakfast

2% A better plan, a man for a better America

2% I’m a Dole man

2% A bridge to the 21st century

2% Just do it

2% Pro-Life, Pro-wife, pro-family

1% Kansas rules

1 b. Had some trouble with that one, huh? What’s your suggestion for a more memorable slogan for Dole? (Best answer wins a MoJo Wire baseball cap.)

And the winners are…

2. The latest polls say that Clinton is ahead by 25 points, so we figure he’s got some serious political capital to burn. How would you suggest he spend it?

We’ve ranked the responses on how Clinton should spend some of his political capital:

1. Start inhaling

2. Renew his crusade for universal health care

3. Reform campaign financing

4. Work toward solutions for homelessness and poverty

5. Strengthen environmental protections

6. Support gay rights

7. Reform welfare reform

8. Start dating

** NOTE: (Voters could choose as many as they wanted from the list of possible expenditures of political capital.)

3. Choose your own All-Star first family:

President:

28% Harry Browne
23% Ralph Nader
16% Hillary Rodham Clinton
16% Bill Clinton
6% (No preference)
3.5% Ross Perot
3% Bob Dole
1.5% Lyndon LaRouche
1% Howard Phillips
1% John Hagelin

First Kid:

23% Kelsey Grammer
20% (No Preference)
19% Chelsea Victoria Clinton
16% Amy Carter
12% Patti Davis
6% Ross Perot Jr.
3% Robin Dole

First Spouse:

35% Eleanor Roosevelt
21% (No Preference)
16% Hillary Rodham Clinton
11% Bill Clinton
10% Elizabeth Dole
5% Helga Zepp-LaRouche
2% Margot Perot

First Pet:

31% Socks
25% John Hagelin’s horses
23% (No Preference)
13% Millie
7% Leader

4. Special VP debate (October 9th) bonus question: Who would you rather have for President?

57% Al Gore

26% Jack Kemp

5. If the elections were held today, and all these candidates had an equal chance of winning, who would you vote for?

32% Harry Browne (Libertarian)

31% Ralph Nader (Green Party)

25% Bill Clinton (Democrat)

5% Bob Dole (Republican)

3% Ross Perot (Reform Party)

2% (No Preference)

1.3% Howard Phillips (U.S. Taxpayers Party)

1.3% John Hagelin (Natural Law Party)

.4% Lyndon Larouche (Democrat)

6. If the elections were held today, and you were restricted to just these two candidates, which one would you vote for?

61% Bill Clinton

22% (No Preference)

18% Bob Dole

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate