Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Tamala Edwards, Time‘s reporter covering the Dole presidential campaign, unwittingly made a prime-time cameo during the Republican National Convention. As Gen. Colin Powell gave the opening night’s speech, ABC cameras panned over the audience, zeroing in on African-American delegates. Several times they focused on Edwards, who sat with the Virginia delegation following an interview. It was good luck for the Republicans, who sought to show a diverse party image, even though only 2.7 percent of delegates were black.

On a break from the campaign trail, Edwards spoke with Mother Jones‘ Rachel Burstein.

Q: What did you think when you found out you’d appeared on screen?

Edwards: On the one hand, you find it kind of comical. “Isn’t this silly?” I thought. I was wearing my press credentials. On the other hand, it’s kind of disturbing. People of color were few and far between at the Republican convention… [I was] contributing to the political spin while a speech was being made about “inclusion.”

Q: We heard that during a routine stopover in Chicago, the Dole campaign made a promotional stop at a restaurant on the city’s South Side. Dole seemed uncomfortable, like he didn’t know exactly what to do, so he came over and gave you a hug and made small talk.

Edwards: I feel kind of weird talking about it. It’s just a strange story. We were in one of the few inner-city neighborhoods that Dole campaigned in. I think his reaction to me symbolized his discomfort in the situation. It’s not so much that he mistook me for a resident.

Q: Why do you think the Dole campaign sent Jack Kemp, rather than Bob Dole, into inner-city neighborhoods to campaign?

Edwards: In studying Senator Dole, I would say that I think it’s a shame the party is not as progressive as he is. But I think it’s that the Dole campaign has just weeks to pull themselves out of a phenomenal hole. It’s strategic; they know that Jack Kemp is going to be better in that situation.

The key fact is that the party is talking one thing but the reality is quite different. They argue that Jack Kemp is campaigning in inner-city neighborhoods — but Jack Kemp is not Bob Dole.

A few weeks later, at the Democratic convention, CNN cameras focused prominently on Money magazine reporter Kelly Smith and a friend during Tipper Gore’s speech. It didn’t bother Smith. “The Democrats didn’t seem to be trying as hard to make the point that they have African-Americans in their party,” she said. (Blacks made up 17 percent of the Democratic delegates.)

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate