Going Native

Ecotourism doesn’t have to be a case of gullible travels.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Leda Muñoz is a biologist who has spent the past nine years working as a tour guide for Wildland Adventures, an American ecotravel company in her native Costa Rica. Muñoz, like many who work in the burgeoning ecotourism industry, says her clients are distinguished from “average” tourists because of their deep interest in conservation, wildlife, and native cultures.

There was that day, though, when Muñoz caught a member of the tour group stuffing seashells into her backpack during a visit to one of Costa Rica’s prized biological reserves. “They’re very pretty and I want to take them for my grandchildren,” the pillaging granny justified, thus augmenting a primary credo of ecotourism: Take only memories, leave only footprints…unless, of course, you see something that would make a nice gift.

Then there was the trip during which a photographer kept rearranging the indigenous people into “more natural” positions. “He was making them pose so he could take the perfect picture,” Muñoz recalls.

Fact is, even goody-two-shoes tourists can have a negative impact on almost anything they touch. But this hasn’t slowed the growth of “socially responsible” travel, or ecotourism, the fastest-growing segment of the travel industry: Close to 8 million U.S. travelers have taken at least one ecotourism trip, and 35 million more will likely take one within the next three years, according to the Vermont-based Ecotourism Society. That’s a lot of footprints.

Yet both the ecotourism industry and conservation groups argue that tourists can positively affect the environment and people, especially in Third World countries — with their money. In theory, tourism can replace an industry that threatens the environment, such as logging or commercial agriculture, and provide local people with a better way of life. The key is to make sure the tourism dollars are going to the right place.

That’s where choosing a good tour operator comes in. Needless to say, many of these outfits were Joe’s Travel, until they found out people would spend money on anything with “eco” in it, and then they became Joe’s Ecotravel.

The Ecotourism Society has guidelines to help find a truly eco-friendly operator. For example, a company should be able to show that funds from a trip go directly to the local community — this includes employing locals and using lodging and food from the area. The society also recommends asking tour operators about what they do for local conservation. Find out if they donate money to local organizations that concentrate on environmental concerns, or if the operators have established local conservation projects.

Most experts recommend ecotourists begin their regional education before jumping on a burro in Copper Canyon, giving a big ol’ Texas hello to the Quechua Indians at Lake Titicaca, or getting friendly with the fauna of Irian Jaya. After all, even the most environmentally conscious souls can become high-impact clods once the fanny pack is strapped on.

One tourism group says those considering ecotravel should “begin from the undeniable assumption that your very presence in a place is going to have an impact, both environmental and cultural. Then, take steps to ensure the impact is going to be positive. Begin by reading articles and books, speaking with people who have traveled there, and choosing a travel company that shares your concerns.” Muñoz, after years of experience working with socially responsible tourists, imparts some simple advice: “Be humble.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate