Why we need it

We asked Social Security recipients how much they value their monthly checks.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Lawrence Woodward, 68, was the first in his family to own a home. He lives with his wife and son on Chicago’s South Side.

I had factory jobs. I worked in machining, and then I became an experimental mechanic at General Motors. I was there for 31 years. We had strikes and different things, fighting for the kind of benefits that they’re talking about taking away-health benefits, pensions, and all these sort of things.

I retired when I was 65. I got a pension, full benefits. Social Security is half my income, a little bit over half. Social Security is the only tool that will more or less protect you as you get older.

It’s a relief that I don’t have to rely on my son to take care of me. I can take care of myself, and then I also help him. His job, he doesn’t get any benefits at all, he doesn’t get any health. He pays into Social Security, which is the only thing that he can rely upon. A lot of companies today don’t offer you any pension. They might give you a contract for three years, and then that’s the end of you. “Well, OK, you done did what you had to do, so now, good-bye.”

 

Adeline “Dee” Dybeck”, is, in her words, “a mature adult.” Widowed and a retired executive secretary, she lives in Berwyn, Illinois, volunteers for the Berwyn Cicero Council on Aging, and does “a little bit of dating.”

Social security is just a scant part of my income, less than ten percent, but it’s what I start paying the bills with. And I thank God for Social Security, because it has enabled a lot of senior citizens to live higher, to add a little dignity to their lives, and all of a sudden we’re the low man on the totem pole. So regardless of how much our Social Security is, it’s still the backbone of our finances.

There are a lot of people who make $100,000 a year and they’re paying the maximum [into Social Security]. We really can’t say, “Hey, they don’t need it.” They paid it. And because they paid it, it enables the people who are in a $25,000 to $30,000 a year bracket to get their Social Security.

I never dreamed that Social Security wouldn’t be there, and I just can’t imagine the chaos it would cause nationally if it disappeared. A lot of people worry about their children because, you know, the baby boomers don’t know how to save. Now if I were still working and donating, I’d want a guarantee that at least I’d get back what I put in there.

 

Richard McCloughan, , 66, is a retired fire protection engineer. He and his wife, who still works, live in Elk Grove Village, Illinois.

I could get along without Social Security, but not because of my own doing. I just happened to be in a fortunate position with some profit sharing and my union pension. I like to think that privatization would be a good idea. But if you took people’s deduction and said, “You can keep half and do what you want with it,” that wouldn’t work unless you policed it so they did something with it — and that gets to be an invasion of privacy. I’m not sure it would work.

 

Rene David Luna, 40,lives on Chicago’s North Side. A former steel mill worker, he heads the Civil Rights Team for Access Living, an advocacy and social service organization for people with disabilities.

In 1977 I had an automobile accident, and I received Social Security Disability Insurance. I was 21. Interestingly enough, disability and Social Security transformed my life. After my accident I went to school – I couldn’t go back to work at the mills.

For 10 years, I received Social Security, and it helped me see my way through college, and some graduate work. It was the only income I had and it helped me make the transition to a more productive and independent life. Now I’m a tax payer myself.

Within the disability community, we’re on the margins of society. Programs like Social Security help us remain independent and give people some hope. I think we’re examples of how it does work.

As a Mexican-American, I’m very upset that legal immigrants won’t be eligible for disability or SSI. It seems that there is a backlash against immigrants, children, children with disabilities. Instead of the war on poverty, the war’s on poor people. We’re reversing the last three decades, when we were a compassionate country that had a sense of justice and fairness and equality.

 

Ida Milam is 71. She raised 12 children and has 19 grandchildren and nine great-grandchildren. She had colon cancer, but is currently in remission. Her husband died in 1995.

I received a disability pension from the Chicago board of Education — I was a teacher’s aid for 23 years — and I got a very small pension check from my husband. When he passed, I went to the Social Security office. This woman sat at a computer and clicked me over to being a widow. It’s more money than when he was alive.

If I weren’t getting Social Security, it would be close to impossible for me to make it, unless I really had some work. My Daddy wasn’t able to put money away in the bank. But Social Security said to him, and to me, I’m saving money for my old age, and they give me a certain time that I can draw this money. It’s there.

I worry about my Social Security being there for my children and grandchildren. I want it to be there so they can work and put up something for their retirement. The young people, I just tell them to keep on working and we’ll keep on praying that we get things settled, that it don’t come to that, because they’re not going to be the only ones worried — we are too.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate