The Less You Know: From Einstein to Aniston

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In an NBC public service announcement, “Friends” star Jennifer Aniston peeks from beneath her trademark fringe and asks, “Why you should stay in school? Smart is sexier than stupid any day.” Clever, huh? Compare it to a 1923 PSA, in which “Betty Boop” creator Max Fleischer animated Einstein’s theory of relativity. After that, PSAs regularly addressed social issues of the day, but ’80s deregulation, media mergers, and greater competition led to today’s network-produced spots, which highlight the actor more than the message. The next generation of boob-tube junkies may know the names of more stars than the editors of People, but will they give a hoot?

1923 Fleischer’s short film, shown newsreel-style to American movie audiences, explains Einstein’s theory about how light curves around warps in space/time.

1942 The advertising industry’s War Advertising Council spends $300 million from 1942 to 1945 to improve the image of big business by supporting the war effort.

1945 Declaring “the war never stopped, only the enemy has changed,” the Ad Council launches print and radio campaigns for social issues. Its most enduring creation, Smokey Bear, now has his own Web site and is recognized by nearly 90 percent of Americans.

1950s TV networks begin broadcasting PSAs, many of which decry communism. A threat to America? Maybe. To business and advertisers? Most definitely.

1963 PSAs push social issues, but the Ad Council forgoes running anti-smoking PSAs. The American Cancer Society creates its own spots.

1970s PSAs reach their high-water mark with Chief Iron Eyes Cody, who tugs at heartstrings with his lone tear over litter, and with ABC’s animated “Schoolhouse Rock.” Created because an ad executive’s son could remember Rolling Stones’ lyrics but not his multiplication tables, ditties like “I’m Just a Bill” are implanted into the minds of a generation.

1980s Reagan’s FCC deregulates the industry, watering down requirements for public affairs programming. “Schoolhouse Rock” dies. Nancy’s “Just Say No” mantra is born.

1992-96 Leading a PSA renaissance, young ABC executives revive “Schoolhouse Rock,” though with only two spots per Saturday. Meanwhile, NBC’s ubiquitous “The More You Know” series highlights its “hot” stars.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate