Prepared for Takeoff

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Prepared for Takeoff

A big-time donor wants to pilot his own craft.

by Jeff Shear

#256 Alfred Checchi, 48, Beverly Hills, Calif. Party: Both. $112,000 total contributions.

View Checchi’s itemized contributions.

Alfred Checchi has wanted to graduate from donor to player for a long time. Last January, the co-chairman of Northwest Airlines and longtime Democratic fundraiser finally figured out how, plunking down $3 million in an opening bid to become California’s next governor. With a personal fortune estimated at $550 million, Checchi will be a major player between now and the June 1998 Democratic primary.

Checchi, whose trademarks are fitness (he’s run the New York City Marathon), family (he has three children), and hair transplants (he’s had two), became seriously involved in Democratic politics in the mid-1980s when he was working in Los Angeles as a financial strategist for the billionaire Bass brothers. While volunteering for Democrat Alan Cranston’s 1986 Senate campaign, Checchi sought the advice of former Rep. Tony L. Coelho, a California Democrat, about a candidacy of his own. “I told Al to get more gray hair,” says Coelho. “He was too young.”

Checchi’s role as a political fundraiser did, however, give him some clout in Washington. Rep. James L. Oberstar (D-Minn.), who has received $18,750 from Northwest’s PAC since 1989, has, over the years, reportedly used his subcommittee chair to help out Checchi’s business interests. More recently, Northwest has led the charge against a federal tax on airline tickets, arguing instead for airport “user fees” — i.e., payments for each landing and takeoff — which would favor large airlines at the expense of lower-cost, short-haul carriers.

If Checchi continues with his gubernatorial bid, he could be on a collision course with Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who is also eyeing the governorship. Until now, Checchi and his wife, Kathryn, have been generous Feinstein supporters. Moreover, Feinstein’s husband, San Francisco financier Richard C. Blum, helped with Checchi’s Northwest takeover and sits on the company’s board.

There is some speculation that Checchi is merely acting as a placeholder for Feinstein: His money ties up her opponents, and, in return, Feinstein appoints Checchi to fill out the remainder of her Senate term. Feinstein media consultant Bill Carrick pooh-poohs this notion, however. “She was surprised that this guy announced out of the blue that he was considering a run for governor,” he says.

If that is the case, Feinstein could be in trouble. Checchi told a group of Santa Clara County business leaders he’s willing to spend $30 million for a ticket to Sacramento, and political consultant Joe Cerrell says Checchi’s budget could be as large as $42 million.

Ironically, California’s own campaign reform initiative, designed to declaw fat-cat donors, works to Checchi’s advantage: Potential candidates without the war chests of incumbency (such as former White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta) are largely cut out unless they have a personal fortune.

Garry South, chief of staff for Lt. Gov. Gray Davis, another gubernatorial hopeful, dismisses Checchi’s chances, calling him “Al Checkbook.” South says, “[Big donors] get the sense that because they are courted by politicians, that by a process of osmosis, they are real political players.”

MoJo 400 Central

 

The 400 List:

Browse
The full Mother Jones 400 list.

Profiles
Meet the people with political pull.

 

Searches:

Individuals
Search the top 400 political donors by name, industry, state, or contribution amount.

Itemized Contributions
The details of every donation, searchable by donor, recipient, date, amount, and more.

 

Discuss:

Money & Politics
Is campaign finance reform the way to a better government?

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate