Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


NAME: Nancy Hsu Fleming
WHAT SHE DOES: Gives civics lessons
CLAIM TO FAME: “SLAPPed” back

Nancy Hsu Fleming was taught that American citizens should participate in public deliberation and government. An immigrant from Taiwan, she studied U.S. history prior to obtaining her citizenship in 1976. But in September 1992, she was broadsided by a pop civics quiz she’d never even thought to study for.

The test-giver was Hometown Properties, owner of a landfill in Fleming’s North Kingstown, R.I., community. When the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management called for public comment on proposed new groundwater quality standards for the state, Fleming wrote a letter to RIDEM detailing the Hometown landfill’s history of groundwater contamination and arguing that the proposed rules would enable Hometown to block efforts to clean up the site. Textbook civics, right?

Wrong. RIDEM responded, but did not address Fleming’s concerns. Then, five months later, she got a threatening letter from Hometown’s attorney demanding she either substantiate her claims, retract her statements to RIDEM, or face a lawsuit for defamation. She’d been “SLAPPed.” (A SLAPP is a “strategic lawsuit against public participation,” a tactic frequently used by corporations to stifle grassroots activism.) “I felt vulnerable and chilled,” Fleming says. “I never expected this sort of thing to happen in this country.”

Fleming responded to the letter with a civics lesson for Hometown: “The U.S. Constitution grants me the right to petition [the] government…to close and clean up your client’s dump.”

Hometown carried through on its threat to sue. When the judge presiding over her case didn’t dismiss the lawsuit — it dragged on for four years — Fleming had to ratchet up her citizenship skills a notch. She took several field trips to the statehouse to testify in favor of anti-SLAPP legislation. It passed in July 1995, and in June 1996 the case against Fleming was finally dismissed.

“Nancy was a beacon of light for people who were afraid to speak out,” says state Rep. Suzanne Henseler, who supported Fleming’s efforts. “She had the moral courage and backbone to speak for a lot of people.”

Last April, Nancy Hsu Fleming got an “A” for her efforts from the PEN (Poets, Essayists, Novelists) American Center and Newman’s Own, which presented her with their First Amendment Award. The cash prize that comes with the award is going toward building her “dream,” a private elementary school.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate