For the Birds

A deadly nerve agent kills endangered birds — and it may poison people. Will the EPA have the nerve to ban it?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Who’d have thought that a not-too-distant relative of military nerve gases would be used to rub out wee sparrows, starlings and pigeons? Sound like overkill? Well, that’s literally what happens every time a bird alights on the EPA-approved Rid-A-Bird pesticide perch, with an organophosphate poison that works by seeping into the bird’s feet, inducing tremors, convulsions, suffocation, and for the finale, death.

To make matters worse, the poison goes beyond its intended reach to kill endangered birds like the American peregrine falcon after they prey upon the poisoned “pests” — and scientists say the active ingredient, fenthion, may be poison for people as well.

The EPA has at last decided to phase out Rid-A-Bird, after years of prodding from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), which monitors the deaths of protected birds that fall into the clutches of the nerve-zapping product. But EPA didn’t defer to its federal counterpart’s wishes — it was prodded to action by a lawsuit and bad press.

In August Weyerhaeuser Co. pleaded guilty to violating the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act for poisoning two protected birds — a great horned owl and a sharp-shinned hawk — with Rid-A-Bird near its Longview, Wash., paper mill. Placed on probation for five years, Weyerhaeuser promised in court to spend more than $100,000 to study new methods of controlling pest birds without using Rid-A-Bird. Lawyers for both sides criticized the EPA for allowing the use of Rid-A-Bird, which was approved in 1990. The product is already banned in Missouri and New York, but is readily available by mail-order or online.

On the heels of the case, EPA scurried to complete a scheduled review of Rid-A-Bird, and is now negotiating with the manufacturer –a two-man company in Wilton, Iowa — to choose a “safer” replacement for Rid-A-Bird by the end of the year.

But some scientists say that’s not enough. Dr. Mary Henry, a toxicologist with FWS, says that EPA should also rein in the overall use of Rid-A-Bird’s active ingredient, fenthion. In addition to killing birds, fenthion can get into the water and kill freshwater animals like mussels, plankton, and fish, Henry said.

Widely used to kill birds, mosquitoes, and insects that cling to livestock, fenthion is an organophosphate pesticide with the same “mechanism of toxicity” as sarin, the military nerve gas — it causes a buildup of neurotransmitter chemicals that makes the central nervous system go haywire. Sarin recently has been the subject of numerous federal investigations because it may be at the root of the Gulf War illness suffered by returning soldiers.

“There is reason for the EPA to be concerned about fenthion,” said Carey Pope, a toxicologist who worked for the Defense Department this summer investigating the effects of sarin on soldiers. “It tends to hang in [the body] longer than other pesticides.”

While the EPA is not yet willing to recall fenthion, the agency is conducting tests to determine fenthion’s effect on the eyes of humans, and EPA toxicologist William Boyes is reviewing a Japanese study that found a high rate of myopia (nearsightedness) in people exposed to fenthion. Another study, by fenthion manufacturer Bayer Corporation, indicates that rats that were given high doses of fenthion over a period of two years had eye problems as well. “A conservative approach is what is toxic to animals is hurtful to humans,” Boyes said.

Dr. Henry says the scientific community is starting to take a hard look at the widespread pesticidal use of organophosphates, which were first developed by the Germans during World War II. “They are much more toxic than we first thought.”

— Laura Linden is a reporter and freelance writer in San Francisco.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate