Pork Illustrated

A new report sniffs out 1997’s worst Washington pork: outrageous paybacks to wealthy campaign donors.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As some members of Congress do their best to kill campaign finance reform, one watchdog group is snapping at their crisp-creased pants: The Center for Responsive Politics earlier this month released its report “Campaign Finance from A to Z,” a revealing rundown of well-heeled donors cracking their wallets and getting what they want from Washington in 1997. Many of these donors contributed millions in the 1995-96 election cycle; CRP ran the numbers for the first half of 1997 and found a whole lot of palm-greasing going on — with more than a year until the next election. We present a sampling here; visit CRP’s Web site for the full report:

AUTOMAKERS, including Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler got two tax breaks in the budget bill signed by President Clinton this summer that would benefit their production of “clean-fuel” vehicles. Ford and Chrysler announced in June that they would begin selling cars and light trucks that can run on gasoline, ethanol, or a combination of the two. General Motors already sells electric vehicles, another type of alternative-fuel car. Environmentalists contend companies will use these new vehicles to circumvent federal fuel-efficiency standards. The three automakers distributed more than $300,000 in PAC contributions.

BOEING and McDonnell Douglas succeeded in getting their $16 billion merger approved by the Federal Trade Commission and the European Commission. When the European Commission’s anti-trust regulators challenged the Boeing deal, Congress urged the Clinton administration to rally on behalf of the aerospace giant. Boeing and McDonnell Douglas gave nearly $255,000 in PAC contributions, and Boeing gave the Democratic National Committee $90,000.

COMPUTER COMPANIES, which distributed nearly $162,000 in PAC contributions, lobbied Congress to extend the Foreign Sales Corporation tax benefit to software exports. This provision allowing computer companies to get a partial tax exemption for revenue generated from the sale, lease, or rental of software reproduced overseas was included in the tax bill signed into law this summer.

DEFENSE CONTRACTORS like Lockheed Martin came out on top in this year’s defense appropriations bill. The bill included $2.1 billion for the company’s F-22 tactical fighter plane, which will start up production in 1999. The defense measure’s conferees also added $83 million for three more of Lockheed’s F-16s — which were not requested by the administration. The defense contractor’s PAC gave more than $312,000.

ETHANOL producer Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) once again staved off attempts to cut the subsidy for this corn-based alcohol, when Rep. Bill Archer (R- Texas) failed to reduce the 5.4 cent subsidy by 3 cents as part of this summer’s tax package. ADM, whose CEO Dwayne Andreas is illustrated above, gave $85,000 in soft money and $55,000 in PAC contributions.

Contribution totals are inclusive from Jan. 1, 1997 through June 30, 1997.
Visit CRP’s Web site for F – Z.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate