Light Savers

Finding the hidden culprits that are zapping your utility bill.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Who would have thought that Norma Esperanza’s fish are such freeloaders. Never mind the cost of food, gravel, and faux flora. The energy needed to light and heat her four tanks costs Esperanza close to $180 per year. Not exactly a fortune, but rather expensive considering she can’t even teach the darn things to fetch.

Esperanza caught on to the truth about the fish during an audit of her Daly City, California, home. Not one of those scary IRS audits, but one provided by Pacific Gas and Electric. “I called PG&E and complained about my high bill,” explains Esperanza, who gladly accepted when the utility company offered a free home energy audit.

The average American family spends nearly $1,500 per year on utility bills. Audits can show you how to short-circuit those bills — often with measures that cost nothing or pay for themselves in a couple of years. And by saving energy, you’ll also lighten the environmental load: Less energy use means less pollution generated by power plants.

Energy auditor Rick Grech has been poking his way through homes for 16 years. Today he is at Esperanza’s to investigate her rather hefty electricity bill (up to $130 a month). Armed with a ladder, thermometer, and flashlight, Grech sweeps through the 1,500 sq. ft. home, noting every appliance, fixture, and weatherizing opportunity.

Most things seem to be in order. Esperanza has compact fluorescent lights, which last 10 times longer than incandescent bulbs and use about 75 percent less energy. Her refrigerator is fairly new — fridges more than 10 years old use up to 30 percent more energy than current models. The water heater is set at 120 degrees, which provides ample heat and a safety measure against scalding. Water-saving showerheads and faucets are present, and for good reason: “My daughter showers three times a day,” Esperanza laments.

The culprits? A peek under the fridge reveals dust- covered condenser coils. A good cleaning would knock up to $15 a year off her bill. A foray into Esperanza’s attic reveals it’s as bare as a baby’s bottom. Adding insulation would save her up to $40 per year. And to save a whopping $200 a year, Esperanza should trade her electric dryer for a gas one. “It’s things that heat and cool with electricity that are major,” Grech says.

All told, Grech found ways for Esperanza to save up to $400 a year and gave her a written summary on how to do it. As he headed out, Esperanza said something few IRS auditors ever hear: “I’ll recommend you to my friends.”

Many utility companies offer energy audits for free. While it may seem counterintuitive for an entity that sells energy to want you to use less of it, conservation ends up benefiting utilities in the long run: Lowering demand at peak times cuts down on the need to build pricey new power plants.

Some utility companies offer energy audits over the phone or Internet in addition to, or in place of, on-site audits. While these can be helpful, nothing beats a house call. “I go through the house and talk with them,” Grech says. “There are certain things that cannot be answered over the phone.” Indeed, PG&E customers who have on-site audits on average save $100 per year; those who do it over the phone save an average of $50 per year.

If your utility does not offer home audits, many private companies provide the service for about $50-$100. To find energy auditors in your area, contact state or county energy offices, or the National Association of Energy Service Companies in Washington, D.C.

For those of you who don’t have the time — or energy — to get audited, try these steps: Install a 2.5 gallon-per-minute showerhead; set your thermostat to 68 degrees, and when you leave or go to bed, knock it down to 55; insulate your water heater; reduce drafts by caulking leaks around windows and doors.

Remember, audits can show you how to save energy, but decisions on what measures to take are left up to you. And when it comes to advice, even auditors like Grech draw the line: “I’m not going to tell someone to get rid of their fish.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate