(Not Such a) Thriller!

Critics give movie studios a thumbs-down for twisting their words.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Of all the illusions Hollywood creates, perhaps none dazzle more than those used in film advertising. It’s a final cut of sorts; a studio takes a review and “edits” it for print and television ads. In the end, a mediocre film is “GREAT!” A real loser is “A WINNER!” And nothing is sacred, not even Gene Siskel’s and Roger Ebert’s thumbs.

The Chicago duo couldn’t believe their eyes when they saw ads for Disney’s Hercules that featured a scene from the animated film in which the character Hades points his thumbs skyward and says, “Two thumbs way, way up.” There was just one small problem with Disney’s marketing strategy: Siskel had given the film a thumbs-down. “We objected that this was misleading,” Ebert says. The ads were dropped — with an apology.

Some critics say the real enemy is within, and that even well-known critics write positive reviews in order to ensure seeing their names in lights. Terrence Rafferty, critic-at-large for GQ, laments that even the most recognizable pillar of the profession is crumbling. “The thumb has been totally devalued. What’s next? Two giant, engorged, throbbing thumbs up?”

But while all critics have war stories about studios, many are more concerned about being mistaken for “quote whores” — lesser-known critics who provide studios with hyped-up quotes, no matter how bad the movie.

Still, studios twist critics’ words — a practice as old as showbiz itself. Here are a few examples of bad reviews made good:

Movie: Seven
(New Line Cinema, 1995)
Ad copy: “A masterpiece.” — Owen Gleiberman of Entertainment Weekly
What Gleiberman really said: “The deadly sins premise…is actually rather corny; it’s like something out of a Clive Barker potboiler…. The credits sequence, with its jumpy frames and near-subliminal flashes of psychoparaphernalia, is a small masterpiece of dementia.”

Movie: Hoodlum
(United Artists, 1997)
Ad copy: “Irresistible.” — Kenneth Turan of the Los Angeles Times
What Turan really said: “Even [Laurence Fishburne’s] incendiary performance can’t ignite Hoodlum, a would-be gangster epic that generates less heat than a nickel cigar…. Fishburne’s Bumpy is fierce, magnetic, irresistible…. But even this actor…can only do so much.”

Movie: Foul Play
(Paramount, 1978)
Ad copy: “Good fun.” — David Ansen of Newsweek
What Ansen really said: “[The screenwriter’s] concoction is all in good fun…. But to anyone who has seen half the movies he appropriates, and can therefore guess every twist of the plot miles before it happens, Foul Play‘s frenetic eagerness to please is about as refreshing as the whiff of an exhaust pipe on a hot city afternoon.”

Movie: Tales From the Darkside: The Movie
(Paramount, 1990)
Ad copy: “It’s fun.” — Janet Maslin of the New York Times
What Maslin really said: “Nothing about Tales From the Darkside is likely to give anyone much of a scare. But thanks to casting that is savvier than the horror norm…at least it’s fun.”

Maslin says when her two boys came home with this movie, she nixed it. “Are you sure you don’t like it?” they taunted, bringing out the video’s jacket — featuring Maslin’s name and her “recommendation.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate