Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Following our story reporting allegations that top Republican consultant Don Sipple had beaten his two ex-wives (“The True Character of a Spin Doctor?” September/October), several notable events occurred. First, Sipple resigned from Vito Fossella’s New York congressional race after pressure from New York Democrats. Then Texas Gov. George W. Bush, a former client, said he would reconsider whether to use Sipple in the future, saying, “This is something I’m taking very seriously.” Finally, longtime client Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) announced he would not use Sipple for his 1998 campaign.

Sipple responded to the article by filing a $12.6 million libel suit in Los Angeles Superior Court against reporter Richard Blow and Mother Jones, charging that the abuse allegations are “false and defamatory.” Mother Jones, meanwhile, stands by the story. After it was published, both of Sipple’s ex-wives issued statements supporting the accuracy of the article. [Editor’s Note: Judge threw out Sipple’s suit against MJ on October 30.]

The article has also sparked considerable press attention, including favorable reactions from some conservatives (e.g., Arianna Huffington) and, not surprisingly, less-than-favorable reviews from Sipple’s fellow political consultants. Here’s a sampling:

“So we have Sipple, a moral cripple, choosing what issues matter most and ‘intuiting’ our concerns. And then we wonder why voters are cynical and leadership absent.”
— Arianna Huffington, in her syndicated column

“Trust me, I was no angel in my private life. But does that say anything about the candidates who hired me?”
— Democratic consultant James Carville, in a column for Salon

“Political consultants have become the paparazzi of modern American politics. They pursue candidates…. They commission negative opposition research reports to dig up every sin, major and minor, that the candidates have ever committed. And I think, frankly, this is just a little bit of justice.”
— University of Virginia political science professor Larry Sabato, on CNN’s “Inside Politics”

“[The allegations were] a surprise. You know, in my business with Don Sipple, he was just a very quiet, mild-mannered guy.”
— former Sipple client Bob Dole, on CNN’s “Inside Politics”

“A consultant has a responsibility in each individual relationship with the candidate for whom they’re working to recognize if there’s anything in their history that will potentially hurt their candidate, and be honest about that.”
— Democratic strategist Kiki Moore, on CNBC’s “Hardball”

“It is fair game if you have a past that is flamboyant, or strange, or abhorrent.”
— Republican consultant Jim Innocenzi, on Fox News’ “Fox on Politics”

“I think the problem is that when Don Sipple was doing Dole’s campaign none of this came out. It was after the fact, and obviously someone went out to get him.”
— GOP consultant Ed Rollins, on CNN’s “Crossfire”

“Don Sipple’s not on the ballot anywhere. Don Sipple’s not running for anything. Don Sipple is a salesman.”
— Republican consultant Alex Castellanos, on CNBC’s “Hardball”

“We have this genre now…of the political consultant and/or pollster to the president — who is in effect a member of the staff — giving him all sorts of substantive advice, and yet there’s no accountability.”
— Political journalist Elizabeth Drew on CNN’s “Inside Politics”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate