Consumer Craziness

When it comes to consumer fads, the late 1990s have nothing on the 17th century.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Consumer fads have a long and not always glorious history. In the archetypal episode, the 17th century Dutch grew increasingly obsessed with a certain Eurasian bulb. “Tulipomania” was the ruin of many an esteemed Dutch family—a single bulb could fetch today’s equivalent of $25,000 to $50,000. Is it any wonder that people today will claw, cheat, and steal to own Beanie Baby dolls—$2.5 billion worth in 1997 alone—or go buck-wild for Sing & Snore Ernie? Some highlights from the consumer crazes of yore:


Must-have-or-else item The price we pay Consuming gets ugly
“Safety” bicycle, 1890s
(The prototype for today’s bicycle; replaced “velocipedes,” those bikes with huge front wheels and riders sporting bowler hats and muttonchops)
Bikes sold like hotcakes for $50-$150 (that’s $750-$2,250 in 1989 dollars). By 1895, 10 million Americans owned the newfangled bicycles. From a 1896 Scientific American: “Watchmakers and jewelers say they are nearly ruined…and the bookseller says people who are rushing about on wheels no longer buy anything…his business has become practically worthless.”
Hula Hoop, 1958
(Big round hollow tube of plastic)
At about $2 each ($15 in today’s dollars), hooping became the fad by which all other fads are now measured. It now sells for $4. Even the Indonesians went gaga over the Hula Hoop, but their government feared hoop-induced booty-shaking “might stimulate passion.” The solution? Indonesia banned the devilish device completely.
Star Wars Action Figures, 1978-1984
(Three-inch replicas of Princess Leia and Co.; made G.I. Joe and Barbie seem like dorks)
More than 100 million of the $3-$5 figures were sold between 1978-1984. Unable to satisfy the overwhelming demand for little Luke Skywalkers and Chewbaccas during the 1978 Christmas season, toymaker Kenner issued IOUs in place of actual toys. Millions of desperate parents eagerly bought up the paper promises.
Cabbage Patch Kids, 1983-present
(Dolls with faces reminiscent of a head of bok choy)
$25 stitched nylon dolls sold with “adoption” agreements. Doll hospitals became hip; sales peaked in 1985 at $600 million. A pregnant woman and a 75-year-old man were trampled in separate incidents by desperate shoppers frantically trying to get their hands on the dwindling supply of dolls.
Mazda Miata, 1989
(Launched as the toy of cars; reminiscent of a 1960s MG)
With a $13,800 base price, first-year sales equaled 20,000 cars in the U.S. Yoshi Taura, president of Mazda Motors told the Chicago Tribune in 1989: “Of our 844 dealers, most are conducting business honestly but a limited few are gouging by $5,000, $8,000, and even $10,000.”
Tickle Me Elmo, 1996
(“Sesame Street”-inspired plush toy; laughs like Chuckie from Child’s Play)
At $28 a doll, sales were projected at 400,000 units for the 1996 holiday season; Elmo eclipsed 1 million, giggling all the way. In New Brunswick, Canada, a Wal-Mart employee was run over by throng of 300 people who had assembled in the early morning hours to snatch one of the store’s 49 Elmos. The employee had been trying to place one of the dolls on a shelf.
Sing & Snore Ernie, 1997
(Mass-marketed Muppet whose stomach rises and falls as he snores)
Frantic shoppers snap up Tyco’s 1.2 million Ernies by early December at $28 a pop. Internet and classified bidding wars erupt, fetching $50 to $500 for this “black market Muppet.” Last week a morning radio DJ auctioned off an Ernie for $2,000—to support the San Francicso Firefighters Toy Program.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate