Ants in Space

Is There Any Uninfested Frontier?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Q. You say in your stand-up routine that you’ve dealt with the “annoying, nagging, hacking sound of an entire community of ants,” but have you had your dishes carried away by them? How do you cope?
—Bryce Armstrong, e-mail

A. Space travel is probably the only way to avoid ants. I hate ants. If I ever off myself, they’ll find a note saying, “Couldn’t take the ants.”

Ants are supposedly looking for food and water, but in my house they’re all over—in my towel drawer, among the pile of papers beside my sleeping area. (It’s as if my house has been invaded by unskilled ants.) When ants, presumably smarter than mine, find a good meal, they leave a scented trail—which is why all their little ant buddies walk in a straight line to the same place. Cleaning away their scented trails should help, but it doesn’t work in my house, and neither do ant traps or crying.

I called a few exterminating companies, but they were mighty tight-lipped. I think some of them seriously thought that printing a home pest-control remedy in Mother Jones would put them out of work. When I asked a guy at L.A. Bugs how to get rid of ants, he stammered weakly, “Without using a professional?” “Well, yeah, just suppose,” I said. He recommended boric acid but quickly countered that it “leaves a visual eyesore.” I don’t know about you, but I find ants all over my house unattractive enough to make the sacrifice.

He told me that the reason exterminators don’t like to recommend stuff to customers is that the customers don’t follow the instructions properly and then they blame the exterminator when something goes wrong. Even so, he very kindly told me about an environmentally friendly product called pyrethrin, which comes from chrysanthemum plants. If you use it, please don’t put it in your eyes. You’ll confirm this guy’s worst fears.

Q. Is it true that a polar bear’s hair is actually clear and the undercoat of the animal is black, and the confluence of these two facts makes it look like white hair?
—Margaret Balistreri, New York, N.Y.

A. Who told you that? Maybe they meant spin art. It doesn’t even make sense. Don’t feel bad. My grandfather told me you could catch a squirrel if you put salt on its tail, and I spent hours in the backyard tossing salt from a baggie without one captured squirrel to show for it. Of course, I was 7, but still I can see how this sort of deception can happen.

I thought this was a crazy notion you had, but just to be certain, I did a little reading. Thanks to you, I discovered that all of these years my mind has been a vapid pool of bear misinformation. In fact, it is a common misconception that polar bears are white. Polar bear cubs are white, but the adults become yellowish white for most of the year and brownish white in summer. Same here, by the way.

I found out bears don’t actually hibernate, either. Bears have a deep winter sleep. According to American Bears, “true hibernation is beyond the bear’s capabilities, since it involves a dormant state by the animal during which it becomes torpid, losing all sensation and becoming numb. A bear cannot achieve real hibernation as does the woodchuck or groundhog. The woodchuck’s temperature may drop as low as 38 degrees during hibernation. It cannot feel your finger if you punch it or hear you if you shout in its ear.”

My grandfather used to hibernate.

Q. Where does the flavor in bubble gum come from?
—Debbie Cravey, Greenville, S.C.

A. I think some news team must have recently done a scorching exposé on Bazooka gum, because when I spoke with the marketing assistant at Topps (which owns Bazooka), he was awfully leery. He says bubble gum is just a combination of fruit flavors.

I also tried to find out who writes the Bazooka Joe comics, but I admitted I’d never even understood a Bazooka Joe comic, let alone been amused by one. He clammed up on that one, too.

It may be that he just didn’t have time to tell me the real answer. The man’s plate is full. He also works with Ring Pops and Push Pops (and perhaps baby wild animals).

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate