Olympic Bombshell

What investigators haven’t revealed: Attending the ’96 games was more dangerous than you knew.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Federal and Georgia state investigators who are handling the probe into the 1996 Olympic bombing — as well as two other related bombings in Georgia — have reason to be nervous.

Mother Jones has obtained information indicating that not only did investigators erroneously point to Richard Jewell as the Olympic bombing suspect, they also have hidden the extent of the threat to public safety at the Atlanta Olympics. And specific details of their investigation will soon be called into question by victims of the bombing, who are suing Olympic organizers for more than $100 million.

While the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) and the Atlanta Police Department insist only one bomb was found at the games, several Olympic officials told Mother Jones that a number of other fully functional bombs were discovered near Olympic venues and deactivated. “I’d rather not discuss the exact number,” says Larry Whitlock, a senior bomb technician for the GBI and chief of the Olympic bomb-removal detail. “I can tell you we had a few. More than a couple.” (The FBI says it will not confirm or deny the number of bombs found.)

The FBI has confirmed a link between the Olympic bomb and two Atlanta-area bombings at a gay nightclub and an abortion clinic, but no one is willing to say whether any of the other bombs found at the Olympics were also created by the same person or persons.

The GBI, responding to Mother Jones’ Open Records Act request, said it and the FBI are jointly withholding incident reports on 21 “suspect packages” that were discovered near Olympic venues by bomb squads. Officials have refused to comment on the content of the packages. (Jim Duff, who heads the GBI’s internal affairs department, discounted statements made by Whitlock and other sources and claimed Mother Jones had circumvented appropriate information channels. Duff insists no other bombs were found.) According to Whitlock, the denials stem from the reluctance of law enforcement agencies to divulge bomb detection capabilities during an ongoing investigation.

Donna Burns, special projects director of the Georgia Emergency Management Agency, acknowledges that Olympic bomb squads “disrupted” 16 packages using a water cannon or manual deactivation but wouldn’t confirm how many were fully functional. “The majority were false alarms,” she says. (Burns referred subsequent queries to Duff.)

Mounting evidence that security forces may have been too overwhelmed with bomb threats to protect Olympic-goers may explain why the GBI is reluctant to divulge any details about the 21 suspect packages, 17 of which were found on the day of the Centennial Park explosion. A report produced by the State Olympic Law Enforcement Command reveals that Olympic security forces were overwhelmed by bomb threats and reports of suspect packages. According to the report, “Incidents reported to the Bomb Management Center were significantly higher than anticipated. This resulted in personnel having to work exceptionally long hours, causing fatigue and safety concerns.”

Could the Centennial Park explosion have been avoided if investigators hadn’t been so exhausted? That question may soon be answered by attorneys for those injured in the bombing, who say they’ll soon be attempting to gain access to those 21 incident reports.

Documents:

  • Read a GBI letter refusing Mother Jones access to records.

  • The SOLEC report saying Bomb Management Center officials were “fatigued.”
  • WE'LL BE BLUNT

    It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

    The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

    Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

    The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

    Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

    And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

    Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

    If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

    payment methods

    WE'LL BE BLUNT

    It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

    The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

    Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

    The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

    Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

    And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

    Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

    If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

    payment methods

    We Recommend

    Latest

    Sign up for our free newsletter

    Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

    Get our award-winning magazine

    Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

    Subscribe

    Support our journalism

    Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

    Donate