Unlawful Entry

How one woman went from filling out an offer for coupons to getting harassed by a convicted rapist.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Protecting your privacy isn’t always as easy as withholding your phone number from the Radio Shack cashier. And the consequences of lost privacy can be greater than just a pile of junk mail. Just ask Beverly Dennis. The Ohio grandmother’s ordeal began with a customer questionnaire and ended with a sexually explicit letter from a convicted burglar and rapist in Texas who wanted to make her “desires and fantasies become a fulfilled reality.”

Exactly how it happened is a cautionary tale for any U.S. consumer. In 1994, as reported by Newsday, Dennis received a notice from Metromail that offered coupons and free samples to those who took the time to fill out an enclosed customer survey. It asked questions about magazines of interest, preferred products, income level, and marital status. Metromail uses such surveys to help keep its databases fresh—databases which contain information on more than 90 percent of America’s households. Dennis, who was just looking to save money at the grocery store, filled out the form and mailed it in.

But when Metromail received Dennis’ survey, and those of thousands of others, things took a turn. Instead of paying a reputable company to enter the information into Metromail’s databases, the direct-mail giant contacted the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and got a deal on prison-labor data entry—a full one-third to one-half cheaper than commercial rates. Soon Dennis’ survey was in the hands of Hal Parfait, a convicted rapist and burglar serving time at the Wynne Unit state prison in Huntsville. Parfait used Dennis’ personal information to write her a lengthy and very graphic letter, offering to make her “sexual desires and fantasies become a fulfilled reality. If you are into sixty-nine, then I am definitely game.” Parfait also said that he wanted “to be there to rub in your Neutrogena” and perform other specific sex acts, and that while his wishes could “only be in letters at the moment; maybe later, I can get over to see you.”

Fortunately for Beverly Dennis, it hasn’t yet come to that. But Parfait is scheduled to be released in September 1998 at the latest, and he knows where she lives.

To some readers, the moral of the story may be: Don’t give away personal information to an unknown source. But it’s not always that easy to control. Often companies like Metromail get their information in more subtle ways. For example, says Evan Hendricks of the Privacy Times, it could begin with something as small as filling out a warranty card on a new stereo you have just purchased.

Upon receiving the card, the stereo company will promptly enter your information into their database. And even if it is careful about who types in the information, there is no guarantee that the information will stay there. The list is a commodity for the company, which can turn around and sell your name to any of scores of specialty magazines or companies that make products to complement your stereo. And these companies could turn around and sell it again. Each time a list is sold, the odds that someone like Parfait will get ahold of it increase geometrically.

Right now, Dennis is in the midst of a class-action suit against Metromail, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, and others. Her complaint in the case makes it clear just how big the problem is. The Metromail survey wasn’t the only bit of information floating through inmates’ hands; according to the complaint, Metromail also used the Texas prison facilities to process data for Coca-Cola, R.J. Reynolds, Phillip Morris, Time-Life, L’Oreal, Days Inn, Six Flags—and Seventeen magazine.

 

Want to keep your private information private? A tip: Most warranties are still valid even if you haven’t filled out the card. Just keep your receipt.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate