Tobacco’s Belated Confessions

It’s taken over 70 years and a lot of hedging for tobacco companies to admit the truth.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As a result of lawsuits across the country, tobacco companies have been forced to release an ever-increasing number of documents which show that they were aware of the deadly effects and addictive nature of nicotine. So how do you counter that kind of bad press? Tobacco companies are trying a bold new strategy—it’s called the truth. Just last month, some tobacco company CEOs finally admitted that tobacco is addictive. Way to go, guys.

But honesty hasn’t always been the best policy. The MoJo Wire takes a look at the evolution of tobacco spin:

 

First, say your cigarettes are healthier

“It’s Toasted. ‘Toasting,’ the most modern step in cigarette manufacturing, removes from LUCKY STRIKE harmful irritants which are present in cigarettes manufactured in the old-fashioned way. . . LUCKY STRIKE’S extra secret process. . . removes harmful corrosive acrids (pungent irritants). . .which in the old-fashioned manufacture of cigarettes cause throat irritation and coughing. . . 20,679 Physicians Say Luckies Are Less Irritating. . .”
Lucky Strike advertisement from 1926.

 

Then be sure to firmly deny any dangers

“We do not believe that cigarettes are hazardous; we don’t accept that.”
—Joseph Cullman, Philip Morris and chairman of the Tobacco Institute executive committee, responding to the infamous beagle study in 1971 on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

 

If the science isn’t going your way, avoid it

“[Regarding] our recommendations for industry research which we prepared last year. . . I have added a list of three subjects which I feel should be avoided. . . 1. Developing new tests for carcinogenicity, 2. Attempt to relate human disease to smoking, 3. Conduct experiments which require large doses of carcinogen to show additive effect of smoking.”
—Robert Seligman, Philip Morris R&D vice president, to Alexander Spears, his counterpart at Lorillard, in the spring of 1980.

 

If need be, say smoking may be dangerous

“Q: Sir, my last question to you is—is very simply this. Would Philip Morris agree that a single American citizen who smoked their products for 30 or more years, a single one, has ever died of disease caused in part by smoking cigarettes?
A: I think there’s a fair chance that one would have, yes. Might have.
Q: How about a thousand?
A: Might have.
Q: A hundred thousand?
A: Might have.”
Geoffrey Bible, CEO and Chairman of the Board of Philip Morris Co., August 21, 1997 in a deposition in the Florida state tobacco lawsuit.

 

If all else fails try the truth, within quotes

“Tobacco is a risky product. . . and under some definitions, cigarette smoking is ‘addictive.'”
Geoffrey Bible, chairman of Philip Morris Co., in a testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives on January 29, 1998.

Unfortunately, some tobacco executives seem to be behind on the learning curve. Speaking to Congress immediately after Bible, Nicholas G. Brooks, chairman of Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., disagreed with his use of the word “addictive”—”I personally would not use that term.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate